On Tuesday 25 Jul 2006 18:04, Henry Linneweh wrote:
I think this operationally impact some people
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasicarticleId=9001972
Anyone else note the irony that the domain names were registered through
domainsbyproxy.com so he is
On 7/26/06, Simon Waters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasicarticleId=9001972
Anyone else note the irony that the domain names were registered through
domainsbyproxy.com so he is complaining about his own customers.
Well ok - if
I think this operationally impact some people
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasicarticleId=9001972
-Henry
Henry Linneweh wrote:
I think this operationally impact some people
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasicarticleId=9001972
I doubt it.
74,000 less domain parked pages most likely.
-mark
--
Mark Jeftovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Founder President, easyDNS
On 7/25/06, Henry Linneweh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think this operationally impact some people
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasicarticleId=9001972
Typosquatters and domain name speculators typically dont have anything
other than pages stuffed full of
Would that many of those in the US would go away...
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 05:48:44AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
On 7/25/06, Henry Linneweh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think this operationally impact some people
