FW: Minimum prefix length?

2003-06-11 Thread Temkin, David
Randy - please stop sending these to me - you send me one every time I post to NANOG. If you don't like the signature that's appended to my emails (not by my choice), and the litigious society we live in, go ahead and block all email from me. Replies directly to you to stop sending me these

RE: FW: Minimum prefix length?

2003-06-11 Thread Temkin, David
] Subject: Re: FW: Minimum prefix length? Whilst we're sidetracking... I took some counsel on this not so long ago to see whether these were just novelty signatures or if they were real legal stuff. Turns out they could actually be used legally, interesting I thought. Howevers its curious

Re: FW: Minimum prefix length?

2003-06-11 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 09:50:30PM +0100, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote: Whilst we're sidetracking... I took some counsel on this not so long ago to see whether these were just novelty signatures or if they were real legal stuff. Turns out they could actually be used legally, interesting I

Re: FW: Minimum prefix length?

2003-06-11 Thread Mike
Stephen J. Wilcox wrote: Howevers its curious that signatures such as this claiming to be confidential are posted to a list which is very much public and archived in several public websites.. not sure how right it is to autoappend them to all your mails as well as the private ones! There is a