The first MPEG-4 HD set top boxes are beginning to appear
http://www.sigmadesigns.com/news/press_releases/030108.htm
Watch this space
If you read the document carefully, you´ll figure that they support MPEG2 HDTV
(1920x1080)
and MPEG4 SDTV (640x480/720x576), which was my point earlier.
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Baldwin, James wrote:
Something I'm surprised no one has commented on considering the
direction of this thread has been should ISPs be responsible for
customer actions if they are not allowed to refuse service to customers?
ISP's can't refuse service to customers?
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 11:11:19 -0500 Damian Gerow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Taking NANOG out, as this is moving a little towards personal
conversation)
Apparently, I didn't read my own Cc: line. Sorry, folks.
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Vadim Antonov
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 5:51 PM
To: todd glassey
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FW: Re: Is there a line of defense against
Distributed Reflective attacks?
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, todd glassey wrote:
Vadim - the instant
At 09:28 AM 1/22/2003 -0800, Al Rowland wrote:
Not to mention that fact that 99.99% of current consumer connections are
not up to the task. Standard full-screen video digital stream is ~6Mbps,
HDTV requires 19.4Mbps. Don't know many consumers with T3s. ;)
Drifting off-topic, but those are
: Is there a line of defense against Distributed
Reflective attacks?
At 09:28 AM 1/22/2003 -0800, Al Rowland wrote:
Not to mention that fact that 99.99% of current consumer connections are
not up to the task. Standard full-screen video digital stream is ~6Mbps,
HDTV requires 19.4Mbps. Don't know
: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 10:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: FW: Re: Is there a line of defense against
Distributed Reflective attacks?
At 09:28 AM 1/22/2003 -0800, Al Rowland wrote:
SNIP
Drifting off-topic, but those are 'raw' data rates.
Compression algorithms along
Al Rowland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
mention the effect everyone on AOL going to broadband and downloading
Disney clips all the time would have on their settlement plans with
backbone providers.
Of course, because you are definitely being kept in the loop regarding
the AOL settlement plans?
At 10:58 AM 1/22/2003 -0800, Al Rowland wrote:
1. I also remember when web page standards required you to design
everything to fit in a 640x400 screen. DTV/HDTV will significantly
change your 'not much in the way of image quality loss' yardstick. My
viewing habits have changed significantly in
Drifting off-topic, but those are 'raw' data rates. Compression algorithms
along with motion-estimation allow you to get full-screen video down to
~1.5 Mbps with not much in the way of image quality loss.
Raw HDTV is about 1.2Gbps. RAW NTSC SDI bitstream is a few hundred.
The 6 and 19.8
Hello;
On Wednesday, January 22, 2003, at 06:04 PM, Petri Helenius wrote:
Drifting off-topic, but those are 'raw' data rates. Compression
algorithms
along with motion-estimation allow you to get full-screen video down to
~1.5 Mbps with not much in the way of image quality loss.
Raw HDTV
Andy -
- Original Message -
From: Andy Dills [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: todd glassey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Vadim Antonov [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 9:07 AM
Subject: Re: FW: Re: Is there a line of defense against Distributed
Reflective attacks
Something I'm surprised no one has commented on considering the
direction of this thread has been should ISPs be responsible for
customer actions if they are not allowed to refuse service to customers?
I'm surprised this hasn't come up since the latter half of the question
also represented a
businesses.
Todd Glassey
- Original Message -
From: Vadim Antonov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Avleen Vig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 7:59 PM
Subject: Re: FW: Re: Is there a line of defense against Distributed
Reflective attacks?
On Mon, 20 Jan
Stoned koalas drooled eucalyptus spit in awe as Avleen Vig exclaimed:
Doesn't this stop kazaa/morpheus/gnutella/FTP/some aim stuff like
private chats? This is a problematic setup, and woudl require the cable
modem provider to maintain a quickly changing 'firewall' :( I understand
the want to
PROTECTED]; Daniel Senie [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 5:22 PM
Subject: Re: FW: Re: Is there a line of defense against Distributed
Reflective attacks?
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Avleen Vig wrote:
Doesn't this stop kazaa/morpheus/gnutella/FTP/some aim stuff
*shrug* just seems like it would make more sense to block all incoming
'syn' packets.
Wouldn't that be faster than inspecting the destination port against two
seperate rules?
blocking all SYN's will break too much other stuff (Instant Messangers,
games ...). I think we would be much better
Glassey
- Original Message -
From: Christopher L. Morrow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Stewart, William C (Bill), RTLSL [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 6:29 PM
Subject: Re: FW: Re: Is there a line of defense against Distributed
Reflective attacks?
On Fri
-
From: todd glassey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: January 19, 2003 12:02
To: Christopher L. Morrow; Stewart, William C (Bill), RTLSL
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FW: Re: Is there a line of defense against
Distributed Reflective attacks?
You nor any of the ISP's may like
At 09:29 PM 1/17/2003, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Stewart, William C (Bill), RTLSL wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Stewart, William C (Bill), RTLSL
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 5:35 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: Is there a line of defense
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 08:58:13AM -0500, Daniel Senie wrote:
While it's nice that router vendors implemented unicast RPF to make
configuration in some cases easier, using simple ACLs isn't necessarily
hard at the edges either.
It might be nice if all router vendors were able to associate
Once upon a time, John Kristoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It might be nice if all router vendors were able to associate the
interface configured address(es)/nets as a variable for ingress
filters. So for in the Cisco world, a simple example would be:
interface Serial0
ip address
-Original Message-
From: Stewart, William C (Bill), RTLSL
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 5:35 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: Is there a line of defense against Distributed Reflective
attacks?
Many of these attacks can be mitigated by ISPs that do
anti-spoofing filtering on
23 matches
Mail list logo
