The validity of the data and assumptions made in the Grubesic paper is
not the topic I intended to discuss, I did not write the paper and I am
not the person that can answer questions or criticisms. I can
sympathize with the difficulties of getting good data for the analysis
that was endevoured,
Is this selective argumentation? I agree that the proper assumptions
need to be made for research. This is the whole reason I started
posting here in the first place, and the request I made at the end of
the post - help making sure assumptions are correct.
What you decided to attack on the
