Re: Fw: GLBX ICMP rate limiting (was RE: Tier-1 without their own backbone?)

2003-08-28 Thread Michael Hallgren
Selon "Christopher L. Morrow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, Christopher L. Morrow wrote: > > > > > Rate-limiting ICMP is 'ok' if you, as the provider, think its worthwhile > > > and you, as the provider, want to deal

Re: Fw: GLBX ICMP rate limiting (was RE: Tier-1 without their own backbone?)

2003-08-28 Thread Paul Vixie
> As attacks evolve and transform are we really to believe that rate > limiting icmp will have some value in the attacks of tomorrow? no. nor those of today. the only way we're going to flatten the increase of attack volume, or even turn it into a decrease, is with various forms of admission co

Fw: GLBX ICMP rate limiting (was RE: Tier-1 without their own backbone?)

2003-08-28 Thread Gordon
Of the DDOS attacks I have had to deal with in the past year I have seen none which were icmp based. As attacks evolve and transform are we really to believe that rate limiting icmp will have some value in the attacks of tomorrow? -Gordon > > On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > W