In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>
>On 10/15/07, Mark Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>> >
>> >
>> >On 15/10/2007, at 8:24 PM, Martin Hannigan wrote:
>> >
>> >> [moresnip]
>> >>
>> >> The way I read the portion of the thread related to re
On 10/15/07, Mark Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> >
> >
> >On 15/10/2007, at 8:24 PM, Martin Hannigan wrote:
> >
> >> [moresnip]
> >>
> >> The way I read the portion of the thread related to resolver behavoir
> >> was that the resolver behavior wa
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>
>
>On 15/10/2007, at 8:24 PM, Martin Hannigan wrote:
>
>> [moresnip]
>>
>> The way I read the portion of the thread related to resolver behavoir
>> was that the resolver behavior was being discussed. Not the client.
>> The resolver should have an attribu
On 15-okt-2007, at 11:50, Nathan Ward wrote:
The way I read the portion of the thread related to resolver behavoir
was that the resolver behavior was being discussed. Not the client.
The resolver should have an attribute to select the preference
between
A vs. . Otherwise, it's setting ne
On 15/10/2007, at 8:24 PM, Martin Hannigan wrote:
[moresnip]
The way I read the portion of the thread related to resolver behavoir
was that the resolver behavior was being discussed. Not the client.
The resolver should have an attribute to select the preference between
A vs. . Otherwise,
On 10/14/07, Iljitsch van Beijnum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 14-okt-2007, at 19:34, Martin Hannigan wrote:
>
> > Is this a configurable option for the inverse behavoir? Seems to me
> > that it should be since it affects the user experience and sets policy
> > for the network. It just may be,
es&id=13
Regards,
Jordi
> De: Iljitsch van Beijnum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Responder a: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Fecha: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 19:48:26 +0200
> Para: Martin Hannigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC:
> Asunto: Re: Geographic map of IPv6 availability
>
&
On 14-okt-2007, at 19:34, Martin Hannigan wrote:
Is this a configurable option for the inverse behavoir? Seems to me
that it should be since it affects the user experience and sets policy
for the network. It just may be, but I can't find the option if it is.
If you have FreeBSD or Windows you
On 13 Oct 2007 15:47:16 +, Paul Vixie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Nathan Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > ...
> > Nice rant though :-)
>
> agreed.
>
> > ...
> > Does anyone have info on how bind (and other recursive resolvers)
> > select whether to use v6 or v4 if an NS points at a re
Nathan Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ...
> Nice rant though :-)
agreed.
> ...
> Does anyone have info on how bind (and other recursive resolvers)
> select whether to use v6 or v4 if an NS points at a resource with both
> A and records? Most OSes prefer the record, does bind behav
10 matches
Mail list logo
