Re: Hotmail-- Again??

2005-04-13 Thread Matthew Black
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 07:18:41 +0530 Suresh Ramasubramanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 4/12/05, Matthew Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 2. After given a numeric SMTP error response code between 500 and 599 (also known as a "permanent non-delivery response"), the sender must

Re: Hotmail-- Again??

2005-04-12 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
On 4/13/05, Nachman Yaakov Ziskind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No? I've configured Lookout often to deliver mail, direct to MX. > Perhaps you mean, "In the absence of Exchange ..." > That outlook sends via exchange is moot .. exchange is an MTA that supports some closed protocols other than

Re: Hotmail-- Again??

2005-04-12 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
On 4/12/05, Matthew Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2. After given a numeric SMTP error response code between 500 and 599 >(also known as a "permanent non-delivery response"), the sender must >not attempt to retransmit that message to that recipient. > > Microsoft Outlook d

Re: Hotmail-- Again??

2005-04-12 Thread Matthew Black
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 11:13:31 -0400 "Jim McBurnett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all, Please excuse me for any off topic info here, but I can't seem to find the email that had the details of Hotmail's new blocking policy. Does someone have the name / # handy for the hotmail help line for sysadmin

Re: Hotmail-- Again??

2005-04-12 Thread Scott Grayban
On Tuesday April 12 2005 08:13, Jim McBurnett wrote: > Hi all, > > > > Please excuse me for any off topic info here, but I can't seem to find > the email that had the details of Hotmail's new blocking policy. > > Does someone have the name / # handy for the hotmail help line for > sysadmins?

Hotmail-- Again??

2005-04-12 Thread Jim McBurnett
Hi all,   Please excuse me for any off topic info here, but I can’t seem to find the email that had the details of Hotmail’s new blocking policy.   Does someone have the name / # handy for the hotmail help line for sysadmins?     The line I got 800-656-0833 just put you into VM H*LL…