Hi,
Thank you to everyone who responded. I always avoid asking for help
on NANOG because it leads to a flood!
However, that is a great thing when you really need something fast :)
Eric
On 1-May-07, at 9:49 AM, Eric Frazier wrote:
Hi,
Is there someone who can contact me off list, who
Hi,
Is there someone who can contact me off list, who might be looking
for some billable consulting hours?
Thanks,
Eric
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 09:31:35AM -0800, Bill Nash wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Alan Sparks wrote:
> > Am I the only one who is getting mailbombed by dozens of these duplicate
> > messages?
>
> Could have something to do with folks not trimming conversation
> participants from the TO: fields.
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Alan Sparks wrote:
On Sun, 2005-03-20 at 14:25, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Martin Hannigan:
Who's got time for all that? Chase the controller, shut down
the user until they buy some AV software.
That should read "AV software from at least three vendors, with direct
Am I the only o
On Sun, 2005-03-20 at 14:25, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Martin Hannigan:
>
> > Who's got time for all that? Chase the controller, shut down
> > the user until they buy some AV software.
>
> That should read "AV software from at least three vendors, with direct
Am I the only one who is getting ma
* Martin Hannigan:
> Who's got time for all that? Chase the controller, shut down
> the user until they buy some AV software.
That should read "AV software from at least three vendors, with direct
contacts to research staff of at least one of them", or something like
that. While it's very likel
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005, John Kristoff wrote:
Tallying then just the TCP 6667 traffic, perhaps eliminating very
short lived or small flows, should be a good indicator of IRC traffic
usage, but tagging those as potential sources for problems may be
Yes and no, in my experience. Depending on the drone, s
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 17:09:17 -0800 (PST)
Bill Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As popular as instant messenger, and increasingly, voip toys, have become,
> actual IRC usages represents a diminishing percentage of inter-user
> chatter. Even something as simple as carving irc usage out of your n
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Nash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2005 8:09 PM
> To: Hannigan, Martin
> Cc: Fergie (Paul Ferguson); nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: RE: IRC bots...
>
>
> On Sat, 12 Mar 2005, Hannigan, Martin wrote:
>
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005, Hannigan, Martin wrote:
[ SNIP ]
Who's got time for all that? Chase the controller, shut down
the user until they buy some AV software. We've gone beyond
"I didn't know" for endusers in most regions.
Enterprise IT staff running from whip-cracking security staff, that's who
has
No duh.
This is particulary _why_ I posted.
It is an operational problem if I've ver seen one.
- ferg
-- "Hannigan, Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This problem turned into the spam problem faster than the
spam problem did.
-M<
--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
Engineering Architectur
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Bill Nash
> Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2005 4:40 PM
> To: Fergie (Paul Ferguson)
> Cc: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Re: IRC bots...
>
>
>
> On Sat, 12 Mar 2
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
Somewhat related to operational issues...
It was interesting to read the "daily handler" log at
the ISC which related their experiences with detecting
(and disabling/disinfecting) a machine/network infected
with several IRCbot drone computers. As s
Somewhat related to operational issues...
It was interesting to read the "daily handler" log at
the ISC which related their experiences with detecting
(and disabling/disinfecting) a machine/network infected
with several IRCbot drone computers. As someone who has
had to deal with with this issue
14 matches
Mail list logo