RG> Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 11:36:58 +0530
RG> From: Rohit Gupta
RG> On a related note : Do ISPs ever tweak around with Local
RG> Prefs and weights so as to select BGP paths with greater AS
RG> PATH length?
Definitely. Case in point: I set up a network a few years ago
that included a choice bet
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 05:10:21AM +, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
> I'm not a router guy (routing atleast), but perhaps there are performance
> problems inside an ASN along a path which you connect to other places? So
> you might lengthen paths through/to that ASN to force traffic across
> ano
Technology
Banaras Hindu University
- Original Message -
From: "James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Rohit Gupta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 11:42 AM
Subject: Re: ISP Policies
>
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 11:36:58AM +0530, Rohit Gupta wrote:
> On a related note : Do ISPs ever tweak around with Local Prefs and weights so as to
> select BGP paths with greater AS PATH length?
>
> Would it ever make sense for a provider to chose a longer AS PATH length BGP route
> against a s
Technology
Banaras Hindu University
- Original Message -
From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 11:27 PM
Subject: Re: ISP Policies
>
> At 11:04 AM +0530 9/9/04, Tulip Rasputin wrote:
>>Hi Chris
fic to flow via some other AS(es). Is it a normal policy to
have, and do most of the ISPs have such policies in place?
Thanks,
Tulip
- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tulip Rasputin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursd
At 11:04 AM +0530 9/9/04, Tulip Rasputin wrote:
Hi Chris,
Or, you just don't want to send traffic through Bill Manning's ASN because
you dislike his hawiian T-Shirt Policy? There are probably a few hundred
reasosn why you'd avoid an ASN... In general though I'd think that like
Michel said: "It's a
> Tulip Rasputin wrote:
> That's why i explicitly asked for some "social/political/etc."
> reasons where an ISP may not want his traffic to traverse some
> particular AS number(s). Something which is beyond BGP to
> determine as of now ! :-)
FWIW, this is exactly how I understood the question. It
Hi Chris,
Or, you just don't want to send traffic through Bill Manning's ASN because
you dislike his hawiian T-Shirt Policy? There are probably a few hundred
reasosn why you'd avoid an ASN... In general though I'd think that like
Michel said: "It's a pain and its doing something that bgp should do
Tulip Rasputin wrote:
So can you give me an example of why and when would an ISP *not* want
its traffic to flow via some other AS(es). Is it a normal policy to
have, and do most of the ISPs have such policies in place?
If you don't have a transit agreement and aren't sitting in the top tier
pee
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004, Tulip Rasputin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a general policy question.
>
> Do the ISPs ever look for some particular AS number in the BGP AS_PATH and
> then decide what action/preference/priority they need to take/give based on
> the AS number(s) present in the BGP AS_PATH_SEQ/
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, Michel Py wrote:
>
> > Tulip Rasputin wrote:
> > Do the ISPs ever look for some particular AS number in the BGP
> > AS_PATH and then decide what action/preference/priority they
> > need to take/give based on the AS number(s) present in the BGP
> > AS_PATH_SEQ/SET?
>
>
> If th
> Tulip Rasputin wrote:
> Do the ISPs ever look for some particular AS number in the BGP
> AS_PATH and then decide what action/preference/priority they
> need to take/give based on the AS number(s) present in the BGP
> AS_PATH_SEQ/SET?
If there is a question that nobody here wants to answer, th
in" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 10:07 AM
Subject: Re: ISP Policies
yes.
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 09:58:52AM +0530, Tulip Rasputin wrote:
Hi,
I have a general policy question.
Do the ISPs ever look for some particular AS number
yes.
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 09:58:52AM +0530, Tulip Rasputin wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a general policy question.
>
> Do the ISPs ever look for some particular AS number in the BGP AS_PATH and
> then decide what action/preference/priority they need to take/give based on
> the AS n
Hi,
I have a general policy question.
Do the ISPs ever look for some particular AS number in the BGP AS_PATH and
then decide what action/preference/priority they need to take/give based on
the AS number(s) present in the BGP AS_PATH_SEQ/SET? For instance, does it
happen that an ISP receives some
16 matches
Mail list logo
