At 12:32 PM 3/6/2004, Brian Bruns wrote:
Lovely. So not only do we now have to fend off attacks from script kiddies
and packet monkies, we now have to fend off attacks from idiot sysadmins who
set this tool up and allow it to go all out on supposed 'attacks' against
their systems.
I think the comp
s against enterprise networks", said
> Richard Forno, former chief security officer for Network Solutions, and a
> noted information warfare specialist. "While other companies offer only
> passive defense barriers, Symbiot provides the equivalent of an active
> missile defense system
On Sat, 06 Mar 2004 10:11:16 -0600 "Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> > Information Warfare? Given the state of the industry, what we need is
> > Information Welfare.
> I'd say so! SDI/starwars was sever
land' and 'strike back before they do' (without of course
any serious proof that they are doing anything). And through it all you
find absolutly know exact details on what they are planning to do and why.
Information Warfare? Given the state of the industry, what we need is
Information
foreign land' and 'strike back before they do' (without of course
> any serious proof that they are doing anything). And through it all you
> find absolutly know exact details on what they are planning to do and why.
Information Warfare? Given the state of the industry,
#x27;strike back before they do' (without of course
any serious proof that they are doing anything). And through it all you
find absolutly know exact details on what they are planning to do and why.
But to be perfectly honest after I saw that some of the press-release people
were from Netwo
Since it has the potential to make everyone's jobs here more interesting, I
thought I'd bring it up and get everyone's opinion. This company claims to be
developing a "security solution" that claims to "fight back" against attackers.
I'm sure I'm not the only one here who thinks this is a tremen
