"Ejay Hire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In my opinion, every network with more than a dozen or so routers needs
> an automated method to distribute massive configuration changes. There
> is a lot of fear that something will break during updates, but with some
> intelligence, that risk can be
- Original Message -
From: "Jared Mauch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ejay Hire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 10:53 AM
Subject: Re: Intelligent Automation of network tasks
>
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 12:3
: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 1:54 PM
> To: Ejay Hire
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Intelligent Automation of network tasks
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 12:39:25PM -0600, Ejay Hire wrote:
> >
> > In my opinion, every network with more than a dozen or
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 12:39:25PM -0600, Ejay Hire wrote:
>
> In my opinion, every network with more than a dozen or so routers needs
> an automated method to distribute massive configuration changes. There
> is a lot of fear that something will break during updates, but with some
> intelligenc
In my opinion, every network with more than a dozen or so routers needs
an automated method to distribute massive configuration changes. There
is a lot of fear that something will break during updates, but with some
intelligence, that risk can be minimized.
Related to this, here is how I distrib
