Okay, they changed it on me. Flame away.
http://www.boingboing.net/2005/09/04/katrina_impact_on_ab.html
- ferg
-- "Fergie (Paul Ferguson)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd be interested in what the curmudgeons on the
list think about this:
http://www.boingboing.net/2005/09/04/katrina_impact_on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
comments in-line:
Dan Hollis wrote:
| On Wed, 27 Apr 2005, Randy Bush wrote:
|
|>to source is still the big gap. imiho, from the ops perspective,
|>only sally's ecn has made any useful approach. sadly, we may be
|>able to judge the actual demand f
* Dan Hollis:
> And there are so many IWF that applying enough cluebats to clear the path
> for ECN is going to take enormous effort.
ECN favors non-conformant endpoints. Therefore, it won't help you in
the long run if the congestion is on a path which is shared by
multiple customers. Popular
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005, Randy Bush wrote:
> to source is still the big gap. imiho, from the ops perspective,
> only sally's ecn has made any useful approach. sadly, we may be
> able to judge the actual demand for e2e qos by ecn's very slow
> deployment. i think this is unfortunate, as ecn is prett
> Steve Casner's paper, which you cited, and Sue Moon's paper at
> http://an.kaist.ac.kr/~sbmoon/paper/infocom2004.pdf, both report very
> limited variation in delay within the ISP network. Sue's paper goes on
> to describe points of variation on the order of ten and 100 ms in some
> detail as
On 4/26/05, Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 11:18:08PM +0200, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Vicky Rode wrote:
> >
> > >Basically I meant to say not congested as the current Internet is.
> >
> > If your ISP has congested links you should
> Maybe you should checkout some performance measurement numbers/papers
> from ACM (www.acm.org) which should help answer some of your questions.
having been an acm member since '67, i am aware of the volume published.
give me a specific cite, please.
> http://www.slac.stanford.edu/comp/net/wan-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
since you deviated from my original post...
http://www.icir.org/floyd/ccmeasure.html
regards,
/vicky
Daniel Roesen wrote:
| On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 02:07:15PM -0700, Vicky Rode wrote:
|
|>Basically I meant to say not congested as the current Internet i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Maybe you should checkout some performance measurement numbers/papers
from ACM (www.acm.org) which should help answer some of your questions.
We are doing some interesting measurement research (qos related) and
unfortunately I don't have any data to sha
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Vicky Rode wrote:
> Just wondering how's internet2 community/partners protecting themselves
> from lawsuits of illegal use of music/movie downloads.
>
> In general, how are they protecting themselves from malicious code
> infection spreading at internet
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 11:18:08PM +0200, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Vicky Rode wrote:
>
> >Basically I meant to say not congested as the current Internet is.
>
> If your ISP has congested links you should complain and switch if not
> fixed promptly.
WTF.. She asked a
On Apr 26, 2005, at 5:17 PM, Daniel Roesen wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 02:07:15PM -0700, Vicky Rode wrote:
Basically I meant to say not congested as the current Internet is.
It is?
Parts.
Other parts have better connectivity than I2 nodes.
You can't really say anything about the _entire_ Interne
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Vicky Rode wrote:
Basically I meant to say not congested as the current Internet is.
If your ISP has congested links you should complain and switch if not
fixed promptly.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Basically I meant to say not congested as the current Internet is.
cool. and your measurements of internet congestion are? cites, please.
randy
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 02:07:15PM -0700, Vicky Rode wrote:
> Basically I meant to say not congested as the current Internet is.
It is?
Regards,
Daniel
--
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
ode
|>infection spreading at internet2 speed? How are the devices coping up
|>with filters in place, if any?
|
|
| What is "internet2 speed"? As far as I can see Internet2 is a 10G based
| national network. What is so special about that in this day and age?
|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Ve
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
What is "internet2 speed"? As far as I can see Internet2 is a 10G based
national network. What is so special about that in this day and age?
I think the difference is the average connection speeds of the "end users"
of the netwo
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Vicky Rode wrote:
In general, how are they protecting themselves from malicious code
infection spreading at internet2 speed? How are the devices coping up
with filters in place, if any?
What is "internet2 speed"? As far as I can see Internet2 is a 10G based
nation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
Just wondering how's internet2 community/partners protecting themselves
from lawsuits of illegal use of music/movie downloads.
In general, how are they protecting themselves from malicious code
infection spreading at internet2 speed? Ho
19 matches
Mail list logo
