Maybe Congress uncovered that mystery in their IPv6 hearings. ;-)
http://www.techweb.com/wire/ebiz/164903883
- ferg
-- "william(at)elan.net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Mark Andrews wrote:
> No. These are just a mis-configured zones.
>
> hangzhou.gov.cn onl
On 30/06/05, Joe Shen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've run BIND9 cache server with -4 option. Is there
> any way to make BIND9 fault tolerant?
>
It is pretty tolerant of its own faults. But in this case it is simply
following the dns spec. You could say it is not tolerant of other
people's
Hi,
thanks for the help.
>
> Because IPv6 aware nameservers make queries
> for the
> IPv6 addresses of the nameservers and as a result
> see the
> NXDOMAIN / CNAME. The IPv4 only nameservers don't
> make
> these queries, as a matter of practice, and only
> see the
> i
> On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> > No. These are just a mis-configured zones.
> >
> > hangzhou.gov.cn only has glue records for the nameservers.
> > zpepc.com.cn has CNAMEs for the nameservers.
> >
> > Both of these misconfigurations are visible to nameservers
i
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Mark Andrews wrote:
No. These are just a mis-configured zones.
hangzhou.gov.cn only has glue records for the nameservers.
zpepc.com.cn has CNAMEs for the nameservers.
Both of these misconfigurations are visible to nameservers
tha
> Hi,
>
> I met a strange problem with my cache server, which
> runs BIND9.3.1.
>
> In past days, our customers complaint that three
> domain names (www.hangzhou.gov.cn, www.zpepc.com.cn)
> could not be resolved frequently. I checked on the
> cache server and found, when the cache server could
Hi,
I met a strange problem with my cache server, which
runs BIND9.3.1.
In past days, our customers complaint that three
domain names (www.hangzhou.gov.cn, www.zpepc.com.cn)
could not be resolved frequently. I checked on the
cache server and found, when the cache server could
not resolve www.han
