Adding a bit to this, folks who give their experiences with the
transits might want to mention whether they are predominantly an
eyeball or content network. For example, our experience with Cogent
is the reverse of the original poster's, but we are 90%ish eyeballs.
I suspect that might be the
On 2007-11-05-10:51:58, Gregory Boehnlein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm considering dropping Cogent completely [...]
Always a good idea.
> 1. Level 3
> 2. MCI/Verizon
> 3. AT&T
>
> I'm looking for comments from actual customers of the above providers in
> relation to;
>
> 1. Network reliabi
On Nov 5, 2007, at 9:51 AM, Gregory Boehnlein wrote:
I'm considering dropping Cogent completely out of my transit mix, as
the number of outages and problems they have been experienced over
the past
year has reached an unacceptable level. It has gotten to the point
that we
their BGP
From: Gregory Boehnlein
>
> Good morning,
> I'm considering dropping Cogent completely out of my
> transit mix, as the number of outages and problems they
> have been experienced over the past year has reached an
> unacceptable level. It has gotten to the point that we
> their BGP session
: 05 November 2007 16:04
To: Gregory Boehnlein; nanog@merit.edu
Subject: RE: Least Sucky Backbone Provider
We had the same issues with Cogent .. I feel your pain...
level(3) has always been good for us - very few issues and their support
has been great from our perspective.
MCI/Verizon did not work
sed in Canada...;)
Paul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Gregory Boehnlein
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 10:52 AM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Least Sucky Backbone Provider
Good morning,
I'm considering dropping Cogent completely
Good morning,
I'm considering dropping Cogent completely out of my transit mix, as
the number of outages and problems they have been experienced over the past
year has reached an unacceptable level. It has gotten to the point that we
their BGP session is shutdown for longer periods than it
