> The reason it appears MPLS won't work for us is that it introduces
> unnecessary complexity. Between running BGP to the cloud and the design
> complexity to accomodate the service...it is not worth it.
it also does not give the end-sites provider independence.
randy
AM
Subject: Re: MPLS or Site2Site VPN
but you do loose the traffice QoS (esp in the
internet fabric) you get with MPLS.
I'm curious...
Does anyone, anywhere run QoS in the Internet fabric,
with or without MPLS?
I know that some companies (like the one I work for)
do offer several leve
(sorry for the continuing top-post) Speaking of Hub-and-Spokes,
what about Frame Relay (from a single provider that covers all
your states)? I imagine that it's probably run over their own
backbone using MPLS anyway.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 05:00:56AM +0300, Kim Onnel wrote:
>
> What about doi
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:07:09 BST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> peering connection. As far as I know, nobody uses QoS
> over these connections and nobody does MPLS peering over
> these connections.
There is no network design concept so misguided that absolutely *nobody* is
doing it. It's a virtual c
> but you do loose the traffice QoS (esp in the
> internet fabric) you get with MPLS.
I'm curious...
Does anyone, anywhere run QoS in the Internet fabric,
with or without MPLS?
I know that some companies (like the one I work for)
do offer several levels of service in their MPLS core
networks. B
What about doing the VPN onver the internet, with IPSec tunnels
terminated in a hub and spoke model, i dont know price wise, but it
would work fine.
On 8/29/05, Todd Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> I'm looking at connecting 15+ multi-state locations together to start
> forming a priv
Todd Reed wrote:
I’m looking at connecting 15+ multi-state locations together to start
forming a private corporate network. The sites are small with 25-30
devices. I want to avoid direct-T1’s due to cost, therefore I’m looking
for alternatives. I know I can do site-to-site VPN, but I’ve als
Technology aside (I would definitely prefer MPLS, simply because it
may allow me to do more with VoIP quality, than unmanaged site-to-
site VPNs), I have not been able to find MPLS providers with lesser
costs than dedicated lines, for equivalent port speed. I have looked
at MCI, SBC and Sp
On 29/08/05, Todd Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm looking at connecting 15+ multi-state locations together to start
> forming a private corporate network. The sites are small with 25-30
> devices. I want to avoid direct-T1's due to cost, therefore I'm looking for
> alternatives. I know I
I’m looking at connecting 15+ multi-state locations
together to start forming a private corporate network. The sites are
small with 25-30 devices. I want to avoid direct-T1’s due to cost,
therefore I’m looking for alternatives. I know I can do
site-to-site VPN, but I’ve also heard a lot
10 matches
Mail list logo
