Hi, David, everyone --
On 21 Aug 2007, at 17:55, David Lesher wrote:
And still not getting it. A friend oversees various expensive USG
networks. They pay for physically diverse routing from multiple
sources. Yet every year, when they do an laborious audit down to
the what fiber, in what
On Sat, 25 Aug 2007, Andy Davidson wrote:
Is it not possible to require that each of your suppliers provide over a
specified path ? I'm planning a build-out that will require a diverse path
between two points, and one supplier has named two routes, and promised that
they wont change for the
On Sat, 25 Aug 2007, Andy Davidson wrote:
Is it not possible to require that each of your suppliers provide over a
specified path ? I'm planning a build-out that will require a diverse path
between two points, and one supplier has named two routes, and promised that
they wont change for the
Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered:
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Or there might suddenly be a reason/market for properly physically diverse
paths which provide partial 1:1 (ie, some services are guaranteed full
backup
bandwidth, other services get
On Aug 21, 2007, at 12:55 PM, David Lesher wrote:
Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered:
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Or there might suddenly be a reason/market for properly
physically diverse
paths which provide partial 1:1 (ie, some services are
It's inevitable given buying throughput is rather like moving
something by ship. You never go to the ship [fiber] owner; you
go to a freight broker who deals with a consolidator who calls an
agent who knows who has chartered ships from A to B on DATE and
This may also have something to do
