Well, if anyone wants to add more to it, there are quite a few
prominent 'noggers still to cast.
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Alexander Harrowell wrote:
Well, if anyone wants to add more to it, there are quite a few
prominent 'noggers still to cast.
Can I be at the bottom of each thread, for when it really gets into wanker
territory? Thanks.
- billn
no; what OS and what applications are you using? Anything
particularly unusual?
On Sep 25, 2006, at 8:55 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Alexander Harrowell wrote:
Well, if anyone wants to add more to it, there are quite a few
prominent 'noggers still to cast.
Can
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Fred Baker wrote:
no; what OS and what applications are you using? Anything particularly
unusual?
Everything is custom. Cisco crust on top, mystery meat on the bottom. (Not
to be confused with 'deviled ham.' It's all held together with a couple of
Perl brand farm fresh
After recent events, may I propose the ultimate NANOG thread..NANOG User: MessageRichard A Steenbergen: Can we keep this off-topic crap off NANOG?Gadi Evron: That message is deeply relevant to us all. I can't
understand what your porblme is.Sean Donelan: Fascinating, User. I suppose ISSUE would
This inspired me: http://highclearing.com/index.php/archives/2006/04/07/4991
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006, Alexander Harrowell wrote:
Christopher L. Morrow: I think you have a point, Sean, but can you try
not to engage with this? ISSUE is definitely off topic.
I don't think I've ever asked if something was off-topic on nanog...
(and 'chris' is fine, no one but my mom calls
