Sorry for my previous mail that was sent empty, due to a mouse clicking bug
;-)
So, at last, here is the summary of the answers, plus additional
information resulting from meetings
I had with some vendors in the last days :
First of all, one contributor emphazises on the fact that focusing on
p
AIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: NMS/OSS commercial software : short summary from
> NANOG replies
>
>
>
> Expansion of nothing is still nothing. Others call it your favorite OS> ...
>
>
> Arnold
>
> >
> > That is very short summary,
Expansion of nothing is still nothing. Others call it ...
Arnold
>
> That is very short summary, would you care to expand a little bit?
>
> Pete
>
> >
> > Hello,
> > First of all, thanks for all the answers that I received from the list.
> > Some of you asked me a feedback on the answers r
That is very short summary, would you care to expand a little bit?
Pete
>
> Hello,
> First of all, thanks for all the answers that I received from the list.
> Some of you asked me a feedback on the answers received, so here it is :
>
>
>
>
>
Hello,
First of all, thanks for all the answers that I received from the list.
Some of you asked me a feedback on the answers received, so here it is :
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Neil J. McRae) [Wed 09 Oct 2002, 12:50 CEST]:
>
> Niels,
>
>> SMARTS scalability? Thousands and thousands of ports monitored... from
>> what I recall from certain documentation, 2,000 ports is `good', 5,000
>> is `doable' and 25,000 is `too many' (for a single installation
Niels,
> SMARTS scalability? Thousands and thousands of ports monitored... from
> what I recall from certain documentation, 2,000 ports is `good', 5,000
> is `doable' and 25,000 is `too many' (for a single installation).
Also its work noting you can have multiple domains and use cross domain
c
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Popovitch) [Wed 09 Oct 2002, 05:48 CEST]:
> Does anyone have any real references for Smarts? Seems like all they
> have are partners and sales to companies that buy one of everything.
> Any one willing to use their company email address and state that they
> use Smar
> Does anyone have any real references for Smarts? Seems like all they
> have are partners and sales to companies that buy one of everything.
> Any one willing to use their company email address and state that they
> use Smarts? Saying that it is wonderful from bakker.net and domino.org
> d
Does anyone have any real references for Smarts? Seems like all they
have are partners and sales to companies that buy one of everything.
Any one willing to use their company email address and state that they
use Smarts? Saying that it is wonderful from bakker.net and domino.org
doesn't len
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Neil J. McRae) [Tue 08 Oct 2002, 19:50 CEST]:
>
> I'd strongly recommend you look at SMARTS Incharge. http://www.smarts.com/
> Its fantastic.
Mostly. :-)
It's solid software, mostly. Not too secure (usernames and passwords
were only recently bolted on, and we all know fr
I'd strongly recommend you look at SMARTS Incharge. http://www.smarts.com/
Its fantastic.
Regards,
Neil.
Hello,
I am working for a service provider based in Europe that sells
Internet access, Hosting services,Metro Ethernet Transport
and IPSEC VPN (based on a mix of Cisco, Riverstone, and Nortel).
For the NMS, we are currently using HP OV
and public domain tools (MRTG, Netsaint, and some others)
13 matches
Mail list logo
