On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 03:39:25AM -0400, Deepak Jain wrote:
[snip]
Boxes like Foundry, Extreme, Redback and many others all talk BGP
(at least to a first approximation) but is their lack of use in
the core/edge/CPE a lack of scale, stability, performance or just
interest?
One Dutch
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Deepak Jain wrote:
Boxes like Foundry, Extreme, Redback and many others all talk BGP
(at least to a first approximation) but is their lack of use in
the core/edge/CPE a lack of scale, stability, performance or just
interest?
With Extreme, it's certainly (in my
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Deepak Jain wrote:
:: Boxes like Foundry, Extreme, Redback and many others all talk BGP
:: (at least to a first approximation) but is their lack of use in
:: the core/edge/CPE a lack of scale, stability, performance or just
:: interest?
::
Foundry makes a very good,
A supplier I don't think I'm at liberty to name. When they were good,
they were very, very good. But when they were bad they were horrid.
Another supplier I don't wish to name. Mostly worked, but crashed if
you made even the slighest configuration change.
I'm guessing one of them is
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Peter van Dijk wrote:
One Dutch ISP that shall remain unnamed (and is not one I work for or
have worked for) deployed Extreme on AMS-IX, with Extreme's BGP
implementation.
It broke horribly.
Then again, AMSIX and their Foundry's break every other day as well :)
In
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 11:35:52AM +0100, Neil J. McRae wrote:
A supplier I don't think I'm at liberty to name. When they were good,
they were very, very good. But when they were bad they were horrid.
Another supplier I don't wish to name. Mostly worked, but crashed if
you made
On Wed 04 Sep 2002 (11:35 +0100), Neil J. McRae wrote:
A supplier I don't think I'm at liberty to name. When they were good,
they were very, very good. But when they were bad they were horrid.
Another supplier I don't wish to name. Mostly worked, but crashed if
you made even the
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002 05:30:46 -0400 (EDT), jeffrey.arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Foundry makes a very good, very stable bgp speaker. I've had them in
my network alongside cisco's and juniper's for a couple of years
now, and i've never run into any bgp implementation problems that i
would
I'm a big fan of both Foundry and Riverstone, as BGP speaking routers. I've
had great luck with both. Foundry has some annoying bugs at first, but these
seem to have been resolved. I recommend both.
- Daniel Golding
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Deepak Jain wrote:
:: Boxes like Foundry, Extreme,
I have to second that. Riverstone is definitely a solid box.
Featurewise, routing protocols are excellent, but services are not quite
there. (I.E. it doesn't support any IP tunneling protocol in any shape or
form. GRE is extremely useful under some circumstances, but sadly,
not with
10 matches
Mail list logo
