OT - list netiquette

2003-11-04 Thread JC Dill
At 08:16 AM 11/4/2003, Owen DeLong wrote: ignore the previous stuff they don't need for reference. If the previous stuff is ignorable, it doesn't need to be quoted. Top posting while quoting material that is ignorable is lazy and not appreciated by most participants on *this* forum. Please

Re: OT - list netiquette

2003-11-04 Thread Petri Helenius
JC Dill wrote: pps: Lazily clicking reply to all and sending off a message (with an unwanted *attachment* no less) cc'd to a bunch of people who don't need duplicate replies typically goes hand in hand with top posting. These are clear signs of someone who is too lazy to bother with

Re: OT - list netiquette

2003-11-04 Thread Jared Mauch
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 03:31:28PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oh yeah: If dupes bother you, 'man procmailex' and implement dupe filtering. For one, with nanog-l delays from one to 12 hours, I like to see responses quickly. # from the procmailex man page, this is supposed to weed out

Re: OT - list netiquette

2003-11-04 Thread Mark E. Mallett
P.S. OWEN, PLEASE STOP CC'ING ME ON REPLIES. EITHER REPLY TO ME ONLY, OR TO THE LIST (WHICHEVER YOU PREFER), BUT NOT TO BOTH. pps: Lazily clicking reply to all and sending off a message (with an unwanted *attachment* no less) cc'd to a bunch of people who don't need duplicate

Re: OT - list netiquette

2003-11-04 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Tue, 04 Nov 2003 15:42:11 EST, Jared Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: # from the procmailex man page, this is supposed to weed out duplicate # messages. :0 Wh: msgid.lock | formail -D 16384 msgid.cache Might want to go for 32K or 64K there, if you get a lot of mail. I just checked a