On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 10:37:59AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > - dominates the list to the extent that others can not use it.
>
> I've suggested to the list admins that we should have a
> middle way in which the offender is limited to one post
> per day. I think that they could easi
> - dominates the list to the extent that others can not use it.
I've suggested to the list admins that we should have a
middle way in which the offender is limited to one post
per day. I think that they could easily implement this
and it may actually be enough to keep the list on track
so tha
On Tue, 3 May 2005, Bill Nash wrote:
> Since nothing any part is saying is changing anyone's mind, agree to
> disagree and take it offlist.
Some progress is being made, in spite of the wailing and name-calling.
The people doing the name-calling aren't contributing more than disruptive
noise,
On Tue, 3 May 2005, Dean Anderson wrote:
Basically, when the discussion degenerates to "dean is a troll", on a
forum like this, it means they've run out of ideas, but don't want to
concede anything, and are looking to divert attention to something else.
And of course, one can't make someone (on a f
On Tue, 3 May 2005, Gadi Evron wrote:
> > Thats right. That's why I debunk them. The lying children call me names.
> > They really hate it when you debunk their fallacies.
> >
> > Vixie is a "screamer", like John Bolton. I'd love to say "procmail Vixie",
> > but he has too much control over DN
> bingo. he's already procmail'ed off by anyone who cares. reserve
> moderation for cases where such doesn't work (eg when the person
> in question deliberately evades filtering).
i would be much more restrictive/specific. i would leave the list
self-moderating except for users who repeatedly vi
- Original Message -
From: "Randy Bush" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gadi Evron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 4:42 PM
Subject: Re: On the-record - another "off-topic" post
>
> > Where are our brand new and shiny
> Where are our brand new and shiny moderators?
why? what damage is dean actually doing other than to himself?
and some would contend, and i tend to agree, that it is not
possible for him to further damage himself.
don't create or invoke forces that are not needed lest you
are willing to regret
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 10:59:37PM +0400, Gadi Evron wrote:
>
> Okay. Paul is an asshole. You got your point across. Now what? Did you
> prove him wrong? You going to such a personal level on-list makes you a
> (chose 4 letter word).
>
> Why do I write this? Because if you can send such thi
Dan Hollis wrote:
> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Gadi Evron wrote:
>
>>Where are our brand new and shiny moderators?
>
>
> When you respond quoting someone can you please include the quote
> attribution line so our procmail filters can work properly? most of us
> have procmail'd dean out, but your res
On Tue, 3 May 2005, Gadi Evron wrote:
> Where are our brand new and shiny moderators?
When you respond quoting someone can you please include the quote
attribution line so our procmail filters can work properly? most of us
have procmail'd dean out, but your response cutting off his name from th
> Thats right. That's why I debunk them. The lying children call me names.
> They really hate it when you debunk their fallacies.
>
> Vixie is a "screamer", like John Bolton. I'd love to say "procmail Vixie",
> but he has too much control over DNS root servers to ignore him. I did
> that back
12 matches
Mail list logo
