Note: delurk.
Some of the commercial traffic shaping devices reviewed here are tens of
thousands of dollars. For a smaller ISP (i.e. less than a DS3 of
aggregate upstream bandwidth), that kind of expense doesn't make sense--
but the need to control bandwidth consumption is still an issue.
Fo
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 11:38:01AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Note: delurk.
>
> Some of the commercial traffic shaping devices reviewed here are tens of
> thousands of dollars. For a smaller ISP (i.e. less than a DS3 of
> aggregate upstream bandwidth), that kind of expense doesn't make
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 12:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Is anyone on the NANOG list aware of a disk-less Linux solution? One might
> imagine a Knoppix-like bootable CD image (perhaps CD-RW, so config files
> could be updated) that would turn an inexpensive Linux box into an
> effective traffic
Even though it compares more with WebSense, CensorNet does basic shaping
plus has some nice features. Free download. (Extra features (i.e. image
filter and blacklist updates) require a subscription.)
CensorNet
http://www.censornet.com/
-W
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 13:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
