Re: RE: Peering at Equinix Sanjose

2008-02-15 Thread Brandon Butterworth
> A minor point perhaps, but most technical people I know prefer to > receive plaintext emails. s/prefer/have/ in a lot of cases We get a lot of spam and for technical matters don't need html which usually gets trapped as spam, as was the posters message to the list. brandon

Re: RE: Peering at Equinix Sanjose

2008-02-15 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2008/02/15 11:34, ChiYoung Joung wrote: > Content-type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 > Content-transfer-encoding: base64 >... > PEhUTUw+PEhFQUQ+CjxNRVRBIGh0dHAtZXF1aXY9Q29udGVudC1UeXBlIGNvbnRlbnQ9J3RleHQv > aHRtbDsgY2hhcnNldD13aW5kb3dzLTEyNTInPgo8dGl0bGU+U2Ftc3VuZyBFbnRlcnByaXNlIFBv > cnRhbC

Re: RE: Peering at Equinix Sanjose

2008-02-15 Thread ChiYoung Joung
70 7015 0623, Mobile +82 17 520 9193  Fax +82 70 7016 0031 ===  --- Original Message ---Sender : [EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date : 2008-02-15 19:53 (GMT+09:00)Title : RE: Peering at Equinix Sanjose First problem is the name

RE: Peering at Equinix Sanjose

2008-02-15 Thread michael.dillon
First problem is the name Samsung. This sounds like an electronics manufacturing company, not an Internet Service Provider. > integration of 5 domestic centers and 30 local POP across the country. Second problem. It sounds like you only have 5 data centers and 30 PoPs in the USA. This is not ve

Peering at Equinix Sanjose

2008-02-14 Thread 정치영
Title: Samsung Enterprise Portal mySingle Hi all,   Lately, my company was ready for peering at Equinix exchange in Sanjose and sent peering request mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] as follow But, we couldn't get any response from other IX members. Could you let me know why nobody did respond us ?