Two recent e-mails made me take a new look at the Nanog AUP, and
I'd like to propose several changes to help clarify the policy.
Several recent discussions have descended into the weeds. I'll take
my share of the blame for my participation. That said, one on-list
event, and several off list eve
Global Knowledge
Experts Teaching Experts
http://www.globalknowledge.com
-Original Message-
From: Leo Bicknell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 10:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Proposed changes to the AUP.
Two
Well, I've received 9 private responses to the e-mail. 7 indicate
support for my proposal, 2 were neutral comments.
I post this because 2 of the 7 offered in their message that they
were unwilling to support my proposal on the list because they felt
it might get them thrown off the list. That i
Thus spake Leo Bicknell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [25/09/03 17:19]:
> Well, I've received 9 private responses to the e-mail. 7 indicate
> support for my proposal, 2 were neutral comments.
>
> I post this because 2 of the 7 offered in their message that they
> were unwilling to support my proposal on t
> --Fba/0zbH8Xs+Fj9o
> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="wac7ysb48OaltWcw"
> Content-Disposition: inline
>
>
> --wac7ysb48OaltWcw
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>
> Two recent e-mails made me tak
> Thus spake Leo Bicknell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [25/09/03 17:19]:
> I post this because 2 of the 7 offered in their message that they
> were unwilling to support my proposal on the list because they felt
> it might get them thrown off the list. That is an interesting
> chilling effect I had not exp
Sure - why not; I have a letter in a safety deposit box in case of helicopters
(of any color).
I virtually never post and think (in retrospect) that a couple of my posting
were probably in violation of the AUP. It does seem that a number of recent
threads have wandered off topic (under any defini
> It would be great to add sending messages encoded in HTML is prohibited.
My apologies for the self-followup. As several people have emailed pointing
out that the original AUP email was not html (of which I'm aware since my
client doesn't do MIME, I was merely following up to the original messag
