Re: Public Interest Networks (was: Re: Consortium sheds light on dark fiber's potential)

2004-11-24 Thread Christopher L. Morrow
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Steven M. Bellovin wrote: > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Deepak Jain writes: > > > > > >Vicky, I apologize if I am hijacking your thread. > > > >Is it just me or does all this talk of Research (and other Public > >Interest) Networks and logical separation by layer 1/2 l

Re: Public Interest Networks (was: Re: Consortium sheds light on dark fiber's potential)

2004-11-24 Thread Steven M. Bellovin
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Deepak Jain writes: > > >Vicky, I apologize if I am hijacking your thread. > >Is it just me or does all this talk of Research (and other Public >Interest) Networks and logical separation by layer 1/2 leave [everyone] >nonplussed? > >How is logical separation of a

Public Interest Networks (was: Re: Consortium sheds light on dark fiber's potential)

2004-11-24 Thread Deepak Jain
Vicky, I apologize if I am hijacking your thread. Is it just me or does all this talk of Research (and other Public Interest) Networks and logical separation by layer 1/2 leave [everyone] nonplussed? How is logical separation of a network [say via MPLS] much different than using a lambda to do