While on the subject of dnsbls, I would like to bounce an idea off the
list. I would like to find out of there anything in existance like this
and if there would be interest in an implementation. I must admit that I
have not checked every single dnsbl, but as far as I could tell, there
doesnt see
I'm gonna post this back publically because it will be of interest to
all (I hope)...
Jasper van Beusekom wrote:
Mat:
Noone is exempt from listing in SORBS, but proven whitehats don't get
blocked.
Do you have many such contacts?
I have a few (less than 50)
Would it be something to cre
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Kai Schlichting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BT have (quite rightly) been repeatedly blocked by DNSBL's and private
lists as a result of their poor record in handling abuse incidents (whether
that's by intent or negligence by way of a colossal management failure is
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> If the guy is asking for DNSBLs to use, and you have some good ones in
> mind, help him, I'd say.
Here Here Suresh, you're on the money!
If they (BT) really have that big of a problem, one could look at this as
a sign that they want to see wha
Kai Schlichting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> BT have (quite rightly) been repeatedly blocked by DNSBL's and private
> lists as a result of their poor record in handling abuse incidents (whether
> that's by intent or negligence by way of a colossal management failure is
> another debate entirely)
Brian Bruns wrote:
I run the Abusive Hosts Blocking List (http://www.ahbl.org). We list
everything from spam sources, to spam supporters, open proxies, open relays,
drones, etc.
Its in use on all of the mail servers I help administrate (which includes
several fortune 500 companies, half a dozen r
and then there's the granddaddy of them all, MAPS. see www.mail-abuse.org.
--
Paul Vixie
On 11/20/2003 at 10:51 AM, "Paul S. Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nope,
> Just an ISP with normal ISP type operational spam problems. I'm trying to
> quantify how often we actually appear on RBL, but I want to get some idea of
> how much credence to give to appearing on any given list.
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
You need a fairly wide coverage of BLs.
# Open proxies - http://opm.blitzed.org and
http://proxies.blackholes.easynet.nl
I would add the SORBS http and SORBS socks lists to this.
# Open relays - http://www.ordb.org
I'd add VISI to that too.
# Dialup and DSL/cable
Paul S. Brown writes on 11/20/2003 10:51 AM:
For example something like the old Dorkslayers lists should be ignored because
they would blacklist you if you sneezed at the wrong time, however MAPS is
probably a good list.
You need a fairly wide coverage of BLs.
# Open proxies - http://opm.blitze
.sosdg.org
The AHBL - http://www.ahbl.org
- Original Message -
From: "Paul S. Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 10:16 AM
Subject: RBLs in use
>
> I have been asked to find out what DNSBLs are in use so my em
Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 7:16 AM
> Subject: RBLs in use
>
> > I have been asked to find out what DNSBLs are in use so my employer can
>
> see
>
> > what the incidence of its being blacklis
Does this mean that your employer is a spam operator?
T
- Original Message -
From: "Paul S. Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 7:16 AM
Subject: RBLs in use
>
> I have been asked to find out what DNSBLs are i
I have been asked to find out what DNSBLs are in use so my employer can see
what the incidence of its being blacklisted is and how much impact this is
likely to have had on their business.
What DNSBLs are being used by the various agencies represented on NANOG and
how much weighting do you giv
14 matches
Mail list logo
