Extreme makes such a device but it is not truly wirespeed i.e. it goes
wirespeed on ports associated with a particular ASIC but the ASIC to ASIC
links apparently cannot forward a full ASIC to another full ASIC without
dropping frames. But that may be an academic concern and is unlikely to
happen
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, Temkin, David wrote:
> With the right amount of prep work and understanding of how the
> stacking works, you can control everything you complained about.
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/products/hw/switches/ps5023/products
> _configuration_guide_c
mer/products/hw/switches/ps5023/products
_configuration_guide_chapter09186a00801a6558.html
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Bill Woodcock
> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 11:33 AM
> To: Deepak Jain
> Cc: Frederic NGUYEN; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subjec
What we do is to use the "priority" setting in the 3750 to determine who
is the master.
switch(config)#switch 1 priority 15
This will define that switch in the stack as the highest priority, then
set your next one to 14, etc etc through the stack. That way you will
always have deter
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Deepak Jain wrote:
> Just a note, if you want redundant 10GE uplinks you need to get two of
> these and stack them. The stacking interface does not reduce the amount
> of switching bandwidth to the front ports IIRC.
...and the stacking interface is actually
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, Robert Blayzor wrote:
> I don't promote or use Extreme in my networks, but I knew about the
> product. He asked, so I just sent the link along. All that was
> requested was 10G and 1U/2U... so there you have it. I didn't reply to
> debate why Extreme sucks.
Every manufact
Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
The Summit 400 is an excellent L2 unit but a bad L3 unit. It is
route-cache based with only a few thousand cache entries. Put more than a
thousand flows (flows=destination IPs) on it and it'll choke.
I don't promote or use Extreme in my networks, but I knew about the
pro
Catalyst 3750G - 16TD
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps5023/products_data_sheet09186a0080161371.html#wp45158
Just a note, if you want redundant 10GE uplinks you need to get two of
these and stack them. The stacking interface does not reduce the amount
of switching bandwidth to t
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Frederic NGUYEN wrote:
> Is anyone of you awared of the existence of an access switch router (L2/L3) with
GE interfaces and 10GE uplinks? I'm looking for
> something small (around 1U to 2U). Is there any vendor selling such a product?
Catalyst 3750G - 16TD
htt
- Message d'origine -
De : "Erik Haagsman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
À : "Frederic NGUYEN" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envoyé : mardi 28 septembre 2004 22:54
Objet : RE: 10GE access switch router
Depending on what Layer 3 features you need
The Cisco Catalyst 3750G-16TD is a 1RU switch and I believe has a single
10GE Xenpak uplink; not sure how many ports you are looking for.
Chris Burton
Network Engineer
Walt Disney Internet Group - Network Services
The information contained in this e-mail message is confidential,
intended only fo
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Robert Blayzor wrote:
> Frederic NGUYEN wrote:
> > Is anyone of you awared of the existence of an access switch router
> > (L2/L3) with GE interfaces and 10GE uplinks? I'm looking for something
> > small (around 1U to 2U). Is there any vendor selling such a product?
>
> ht
http://foundrynet.com/products/l23wiringcloset/fastiron/FESX424_X448.html
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:26:24 +0200, Frederic NGUYEN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is anyone of you awared of the existence of an access switch router (L2/L3) with GE
> interfaces and 10GE uplinks? I'm looking for
> some
Frederic NGUYEN wrote:
Is anyone of you awared of the existence of an access switch router
(L2/L3) with GE interfaces and 10GE uplinks? I'm looking for something
small (around 1U to 2U). Is there any vendor selling such a product?
http://www.extremenetworks.com/libraries/prodpdfs/products/Summit
14 matches
Mail list logo
