Thus spake David Schwartz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [24/09/03 17:39]:
> If anyone who attempts to distribute such a list is DoSed to oblivion,
> people will stop being willing to distribute such a list. Yes, spam is an
> economic activity, but spammers may engage in long-term planning. You can't
>
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, David Schwartz wrote:
>
>
> > Each mailserver could keep a cryptographically verified list, the
> > list is distributed via some P2P mechanism, and DoS directed at the
> > 'source' of the service only interrupts updates, and only does so until
> > the source slips an up
> Each mailserver could keep a cryptographically verified list, the
> list is distributed via some P2P mechanism, and DoS directed at the
> 'source' of the service only interrupts updates, and only does so until
> the source slips an updated copy of the list to a few peers, and then
> the upd
