On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 09:51:47AM -0500, James Jun wrote:
>
> > On Oct 31, 2006, at 2:12 AM, Bob Collie wrote:
> >
> > > That looks like a transit connection that Cogent bought at Ashburn,
> > > VA,
> > > not SFI peering connection.
> >
> > Hrmm, I can't tell by looking at a traceroute who pai
Hi Fredy,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fredy Kuenzler) wrote:
> Think of 174 started to peer with 1239 and redirecting some outbound
> traffic to 3320 over this new peer. Since 3320 is buying from 1239, they
> will pay more to 1239, and 1239 accepts 174 as a new peer because they
> get more money from 332
Patrick W. Gilmore schrieb:
Hrmm, I can't tell by looking at a traceroute who paid whom, if
anyone. Care to explain your magic? Is there a code in the in-addrs?
Perhaps "sl-$FOO" means something in Sprint-speak?
Secondly, does anyone really give a rat's ass who is "SFI" any
longer? There are a
> On Oct 31, 2006, at 2:12 AM, Bob Collie wrote:
>
> > That looks like a transit connection that Cogent bought at Ashburn,
> > VA,
> > not SFI peering connection.
>
> Hrmm, I can't tell by looking at a traceroute who paid whom, if
> anyone. Care to explain your magic? Is there a code in the in
On Oct 31, 2006, at 2:12 AM, Bob Collie wrote:
That looks like a transit connection that Cogent bought at Ashburn,
VA,
not SFI peering connection.
Hrmm, I can't tell by looking at a traceroute who paid whom, if
anyone. Care to explain your magic? Is there a code in the in-
addrs? Perh
11:13 PM
To: Ed Ray; nanog@merit.edu
Subject: RE: Cogent now peering with Sprint?
That looks like a transit connection that Cogent bought at Ashburn, VA,
not SFI peering connection.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Ed Ray
Sent: Tuesday
That looks like a transit connection that Cogent bought at Ashburn, VA,
not SFI peering connection.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Ed Ray
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 12:11 AM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Cogent now peering with Sprin
