RE: Copper 10 gigabit @ 15 metres

2003-11-05 Thread Henry Linneweh
While there are some smitherings about 10GigE, there are technical reasons and market reasons it is not really ready for prime yet, that is not to say it's not going to happen, it is just not going happen now. -HenryMikael Abrahamsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Deepak Jain

RE: Copper 10 gigabit @ 15 metres

2003-11-05 Thread Henry Linneweh
10GigE fiber will be the better choice in the long run -HenryDeepak Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=42956site=lightreading http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/10GBCX4/ Regarding the first URL, I am curious how many networks will be interested in

Re: Copper 10 gigabit @ 15 metres

2003-11-05 Thread Neil J. McRae
While there are some smitherings about 10GigE, there are technical reasons and market reasons it is not really ready for prime yet, that is not to say it's not going to happen, it is just not going happen now. Some people are using it in the MAN and WAN now though.

RE: Copper 10 gigabit @ 15 metres

2003-11-05 Thread Deepak Jain
While there are some smitherings about 10GigE, there are technical reasons and market reasons it is not really ready for prime yet, that is not to say it's not going to happen, it is just not going happen now. Some people are using it in the MAN and WAN now though. Exactly. At the

RE: Copper 10 gigabit @ 15 metres

2003-11-05 Thread Mikael Abrahamsson
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Deepak Jain wrote: When you are aggregating lots of a GEs, there isn't really a great, cost-effective way to move all of these bits cost-effectively. nxOC48 is pretty cheap, but a little ugly if you need the bandwidth unchoked. 10GE is supposed to get there, but at a

RE: Copper 10 gigabit @ 15 metres

2003-11-05 Thread Henry Linneweh
The backbone at the time of my original work that I participated in was 40Gits/in and 40Gbits/out unless that has changed 10GigE is not practical or cost effective if it is limited to local area's and provate connections. That doesn't mean from A design perspective thatA cost effective solution

RE: Copper 10 gigabit @ 15 metres

2003-11-05 Thread Deepak Jain
PROTECTED]Subject: RE: Copper 10 gigabit @ 15 metres The backbone at the time of my original work that I participated in was 40Gits/in and 40Gbits/out unless that has changed 10GigE is not practical or cost effective if it is limited to local area's and provate connections. That doesn't

RE: Copper 10 gigabit @ 15 metres

2003-11-05 Thread Henry Linneweh
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Henry LinnewehSent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 7:03 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Neil J. McRaeCc: Mikael Abrahamsson; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: Copper 10 gigabit @ 15 metres The backbone at the time of my original work that I participated in was 40Gits

RE: Copper 10 gigabit @ 15 metres

2003-11-04 Thread Deepak Jain
http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=42956site=lightreading http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/10GBCX4/ Regarding the first URL, I am curious how many networks will be interested in using a 15 metre 10GbE solution. Even for intra-MMR xconns, it seems like the cable length