On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Running email abuse desks for about a decade now makes me
> > tend to agree with you .. and completely unfiltered pipes to
> > the internet for customer broadband are a pipe dream, most places.
>
> If ISPs were able to standardize consumer Inte
> Running email abuse desks for about a decade now makes me
> tend to agree with you .. and completely unfiltered pipes to
> the internet for customer broadband are a pipe dream, most places.
If ISPs were able to standardize consumer Internet access services using
a gateway box, then the necess
On 7/23/07, Sean Donelan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But, like other attempts to respond to network abuse (e.g. various
block lists), sometimes there are false positives and mistakes. When
it happens, you tweak the filters and undue the wrong block. Demanding
zero chance of error before ISPs d
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
What should be the official IETF recognized method for network operators
to asynchronously communicate with users/hosts connect to the network for
various reasons getting those machines cleaned up?
Most large carriers that are also MAAWG membe
On 7/23/07, Sean Donelan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What should be the official IETF recognized method for network operators
to asynchronously communicate with users/hosts connect to the network for
various reasons getting those machines cleaned up?
Most large carriers that are also MAAWG m
Hiya,
Plenty of boxes can do redirection in the middle such as Redback,
Ellacoya etc.
We redirect customers who are infected to a web page when the first
connect. Then every few hours they get re-directed again, just enough so
it's a bit annoying.
If they ignore this for a few weeks, they get re
