RE: IP over in-ground cable applications.

2002-09-12 Thread Sameer R. Manek
L PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 8:27 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: IP over in-ground cable applications. > > > I've been called a lot of things, but moron isn't one

RE: IP over in-ground cable applications.

2002-09-12 Thread sal . sabella
> I've been called a lot of things, but moron isn't one of them. Want to make a bet on it with your boss? Moron. Sal Sabella Get your free encrypted email at https://www.hushmail.com

RE: IP over in-ground cable applications.

2002-09-12 Thread Christopher J. Wolff
tember 12, 2002 3:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: IP over in-ground cable applications. > I'm not a big fan of GE period; too many recalls. However you > might want to take a look at Jennair I had a bet with my boss that GE would bring good things to li

RE: IP over in-ground cable applications.

2002-09-12 Thread sal . sabella
> I'm not a big fan of GE period; too many recalls. However you > might want to take a look at Jennair I had a bet with my boss that GE would bring good things to life. Please don't tell me I lost. Sal Sabella Get your free encrypted email at https://www.hushmail.com

RE: IP over in-ground cable applications.

2002-09-12 Thread Christopher J. Wolff
atories, Inc. http://www.bblabs.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: IP over in-ground cable applications. >Thanks for the response. The 'Broadband&

RE: IP over in-ground cable applications.

2002-09-12 Thread sal . sabella
>Thanks for the response. The 'Broadband' in Broadband Laboratories >actually refers to the Microwave That makes sense. I have a question you might be able to answer. I've got some Cerent and Sycamore boxes, and I'm trying to locate a GE Advantium line card. We're fixing to sell Advantium w

Re: IP over in-ground cable applications.

2002-09-12 Thread Vinny Abello
At 02:28 PM 9/12/2002 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >"Christopher J. Wolff" wrote: > > Can anyone recommend a method for integrating TCP/IP with an existing > > analog cable television network. > >Yes Chris, it's called DOCSIS. I would think that a CIO of a company >named "Broadband Labs" wo

RE: IP over in-ground cable applications.

2002-09-12 Thread Christopher J. Wolff
Broadband Laboratories, Inc. http://www.bblabs.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 2:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: IP over in-ground cable applications. "Christopher

Re: IP over in-ground cable applications.

2002-09-12 Thread sal . sabella
"Christopher J. Wolff" wrote: > Can anyone recommend a method for integrating TCP/IP with an existing > analog cable television network. Yes Chris, it's called DOCSIS. I would think that a CIO of a company named "Broadband Labs" would have a lab in which to experiment with cable. > My current

Re: IP over in-ground cable applications.

2002-09-12 Thread Marshall Eubanks
Inc. > http://www.bblabs.com > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > Nathan Stratton > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:29 AM > To: Christopher J. Wolff > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: IP over in-ground cable app

Re: IP over in-ground cable applications.

2002-09-12 Thread David G. Andersen
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 03:04:35PM -0400, Deepak Jain mooed: > > > You would need multicast speakers (routers, etc) along the cable route to > effectively multiple your bandwidth at all. Since cable is already > multicasting (1 stream to many/all) I don't think I see any advantage. > > Unless,

Re: IP over in-ground cable applications.

2002-09-12 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
In article , Christopher J. Wolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Can anyone recommend a method for integrating TCP/IP with an existing >analog cable television network. http://www.google.com/search?q=docsis Mike.

RE: IP over in-ground cable applications.

2002-09-12 Thread Deepak Jain
an Stratton' > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: IP over in-ground cable applications. > > > > Nathan, > > If your MPEG2 video were multicast streams, wouldn't that be a much more > effective utilization of bandwidth? > > Regards, > Christoph

Re: IP over in-ground cable applications.

2002-09-12 Thread Petri Helenius
"Christopher J. Wolff" wrote: > My current thoughts on this are to digitize the satellite video into > mpeg2 and deliver it over TCP/IP through the in-ground cable. This way, > integrating the video and data portion are easy, however the resident > would need to buy a mpeg2 set-top-box to split

Re: IP over in-ground cable applications.

2002-09-12 Thread Majdi S. Abbas
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 11:24:15AM -0700, Christopher J. Wolff wrote: > The cable companies do this quite well; however, it's not > immediately clear to me how I would multiplex the IP traffic and > the existing video and deliver it to a home. Well, the traditional solutions involve som

RE: IP over in-ground cable applications.

2002-09-12 Thread Christopher J. Wolff
ehalf Of Nathan Stratton Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:29 AM To: Christopher J. Wolff Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: IP over in-ground cable applications. On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Christopher J. Wolff wrote: > Greetings, > > Can anyone recommend a method for integrating TCP/IP wi

Re: IP over in-ground cable applications.

2002-09-12 Thread Nathan Stratton
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Christopher J. Wolff wrote: > Greetings, > > Can anyone recommend a method for integrating TCP/IP with an existing > analog cable television network. The cable companies do this quite > well; however, it's not immediately clear to me how I would multiplex > the IP traffic