From: "Sean Donelan"
> On the other hand, security is a much bigger "win" for a larger provider
> than for a small provider. As Willie Sutton use to say, he robbed banks
> because that's were the money was. Larger providers have more exposure,
> and more to loose. Even a non-directed attack su
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > in this. My question is why large providers couldn't interlink themselves
> > and establish guidelines for notification and resolution of network issues.
> > They manage it for peering, why not for overall performance and security
> > issues?
>
> "I
I say to that...
http://www.ofcourseimright.com/~lear/fishbowl.jpg
I very much agree with Vladis here.
I'm probably stating the obvious, but.. One of the major points visible
during virtually any one of these significant security events is the way
coordination works, how well processes are defined and how well they end up
working in terms of tactical detecti
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 04:21:40 CST, Jack Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> in this. My question is why large providers couldn't interlink themselves
> and establish guidelines for notification and resolution of network issues.
> They manage it for peering, why not for overall performance and securi
From: "Sean Donelan"
> Who has the biggest wall of big screen monitors?
>
To my knowledge, Norad still does.
The "Global Early Warning Information System," (GEWIS, pronounced
"gee-whiz")
[...]
Mark Rasch, former head of the Justice Department's Computer Crime division,
questioned the need for G
