Here is an article that addresses some of these very
issues, naturally there is always a costing factor,
because non of the sought for solutions are easy to
come by.
http://www.networkcomputing.com/showitem.jhtml?docid=1616f3
-Henry
--- Daniel Senie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> At 12:41 P
At 12:41 PM 8/22/2005, Aaron Glenn wrote:
On 8/22/05, Simon Hamilton-Wilkes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> They support P/S2 / USB / Sun and serial - though are a very expensive
> way to do serial.
And (last time I looked, at least) they required an expensive,
proprietary, Windows-only authent
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Kevin
> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 10:27 PM
> To: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Re: KVM over IP suggestions?
>
> > We have a non-IP switch from Raritan and saw presen
n" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 1:26 PM
Subject: Re: KVM over IP suggestions?
On 8/22/05, Matthew Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 11:15:23 -0400
> "Drew Weaver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
ot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 9:56 AM
Subject: Re: KVM over IP suggestions?
>
>
> On 8/22/2005 11:15 AM, Drew Weaver wrote:
> > Howdy, I'm looking for a way to give our remote users access
> > to their servers, perhaps a KVM-IP
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 8:25 AM
Subject: Re: KVM over IP suggestions?
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 11:15:23AM -0400, Drew Weaver wrote:
> > Howdy, I'm looking for a way to give our remote users access
> > to their servers, perha
From: "Drew Weaver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Any suggestions would be helpful.<<
-Just- got this in an E-mail, fwiw.
http://www.nwc.com/showitem.jhtml?docid=1616f3
Drew Weaver wrote:
Howdy, I’m looking for a way to give our remote users access to their
servers, perhaps a KVM-IP solution. What we need is support for
multiple users (more than 2), with access control that limits what
users can connect to what ports on the KVM switch, and would allow you
B
On 8/22/05, Matthew Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 11:15:23 -0400
> "Drew Weaver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Howdy, I'm looking for a way to give our remote users access
> > to their servers, perhaps a KVM-IP solution. What we need is support for
> > multipl
es with it.
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Glenn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 9:42 AM
To: Simon Hamilton-Wilkes
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: KVM over IP Suggestions?
On 8/22/05, Simon Hamilton-Wilkes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> They support P/S2
On 8/22/2005 11:15 AM, Drew Weaver wrote:
> Howdy, I'm looking for a way to give our remote users access
> to their servers, perhaps a KVM-IP solution.
> Any suggestions would be helpful.
http://www.nwc.com/shared/article/printFullArticle.jhtml?articleID=168500010
--
Eric A. Hall
On 8/22/05, Drew Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Any suggestions would be helpful.
>
I'd take a look at Cyclades offering. http://www.cyclades.com/products/kvmnet/
aaron.glenn
On 8/22/05, Simon Hamilton-Wilkes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> They support P/S2 / USB / Sun and serial - though are a very expensive
> way to do serial.
And (last time I looked, at least) they required an expensive,
proprietary, Windows-only authentication server (DSView) in addition
to the c
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 11:15:23 -0400
"Drew Weaver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Howdy, I'm looking for a way to give our remote users access
to their servers, perhaps a KVM-IP solution. What we need is support for
multiple users (more than 2), with access control that limits what users
Title: Re: KVM over IP suggestions?
I think this could make it:
http://www.lantronix.com/data-center-management/kvm-solutions/securelinx-slk.html
Regards,
Jordi
De: Drew Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Responder a: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fecha: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 11:15:23 -0400
Para:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 11:15:23AM -0400, Drew Weaver wrote:
> Howdy, I'm looking for a way to give our remote users access
> to their servers, perhaps a KVM-IP solution. What we need is support for
> multiple users (more than 2), with access control that limits what users
> can connec
16 matches
Mail list logo
