> > Consider this topology
> >
> > GSR - 3750 --(GE over 4xVC4) - NSE100 - NSE100 --(GE over 4xVC4) -- 3550 -
> > GSR
>
> This should have been Nortel GBE, not Lucent my bad.
My first best guess was right, it was lucent system after all.
We've now solved the issue, problem is in GBE card in L
On (2007-09-21 16:12 +0300), Saku Ytti wrote:
> (oops technical question in nanog, wearing my asbestos suit)
>
> Consider this topology
>
> GSR - 3750 --(GE over 4xVC4) - NSE100 - NSE100 --(GE over 4xVC4) -- 3550 - GSR
This should have been Nortel GBE, not Lucent my bad.
Anyhow, just wanted f
On (2006-09-21 18:49 +0100), Sam Stickland wrote:
> Did you try power cycling the Lucents after changing the auto-neg
> settings? I've seen some broken autoneg implementations in the past on
> managed media converters that didn't change settings immediately. It's
> worth a shot as you seem to
Saku Ytti wrote:
(oops technical question in nanog, wearing my asbestos suit)
Consider this topology
GSR - 3750 --(GE over 4xVC4) - NSE100 - NSE100 --(GE over 4xVC4) -- 3550 - GSR
All other fibres are dark fibres, except marked.
When we ping either NSE100 <-> GSR leg, when there is no backgr
On (2006-09-21 06:32 -0700), David Temkin wrote:
> > traffic also. We've tried to turn PXF off in NSE100. Packets
> Silly question (considering that you stated that IS-IS is borked also,
> which is not handled by PXF - but did you try disabling PXF?
Not silly question at all, it was just long
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Saku Ytti
> Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 9:12 AM
> To: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Lucent GBE (4 x VC4) clues needed
>
>
> (oops technical question in nanog, wearing my asbestos suit)
>
> Consi
