Forgive me..
I thought I understood that 1918 routes were leaking
Jim
>-Original Message-
>From: Sean Donelan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 12:26 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: Net-24 top prefix generating bogus RFC-1918 queries
>
On Sun, 1 Jun 2003, McBurnett, Jim wrote:
> guys.. I have a thought...
> I am a charter fiber customer..
> AND they use lots of 1918 address for management even some customer links.
> I have seen this on all the cable providers..
> unlike Sprint/MCI/ATT they don't use 100% RW on all their equipmen
t; From: John Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 1:55 AM
> To: Roland Verlander
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Net-24 top prefix generating bogus RFC-1918 queries
>
>
>
> >
> > Why does 65/8 generate almost as many queries as 24/8?
&
s not filtering properly..
-Original Message-
From: John Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 1:55 AM
To: Roland Verlander
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Net-24 top prefix generating bogus RFC-1918 queries
>
> Why does 65/8 generate almost as many quer
On Sat, 31 May 2003, John Brown wrote:
>
> >
> > Why does 65/8 generate almost as many queries as 24/8?
>
> because there are lots of cable and DSL users in those
> prefix's
>
> My cable at home is net-65
My SBC DSL that this email is coming from is in 65.
Justin
>
> Why does 65/8 generate almost as many queries as 24/8?
because there are lots of cable and DSL users in those
prefix's
My cable at home is net-65
John Brown wrote:
> Operators within Net-24 (typically Cable Operators) would
> do good in setting up a AS112 anycasted DNS server within
> their networks.
Same with 68/8. A few large cable operators (Cox, Comcast, Charter,
RoadRunner, etc.) have netblocks in 68/8.
.
> Based on a 1,000,000 query
