Andy Dills wrote:
Yes, but the original poster was dealing with DS3s connected to different
NAPs, which is why the packet out-of-order issue can be significant.
I'd say that a more significant issue is customer throughput. The nice
aspect of per conn is that it not only tends to keep a decent
: Vandy Hamidi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 7/2/2003 3:35 PM
To: prue
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Newbie network upgrade question, apologies in advance to NANOG
I would agree only under certain limited situations.
Per
upgrade question, apologies in advance to
NANOG
On Sun, 29 Jun 2003, Mary Grace wrote:
So, is it still true that we do not need anything more powerful than a 4500
or 4700 to run this system? I believe that is true if we take default
routes advertised by the upstream on both sides
On Sun, 29 Jun 2003, Mary Grace wrote:
So, is it still true that we do not need anything more powerful than a 4500
or 4700 to run this system? I believe that is true if we take default
routes advertised by the upstream on both sides, and the two diverse-path
circuits ARE being advertised
