Re: Provider feedback Aleron=BAD!

2002-11-02 Thread Alex Rubenstein
RFC 2050 infers something different: 2 Allocation Framework 2.1 Guidelines for Internet Service Providers (ISPs) This document makes a distinction between the allocation of IP addresses and the assignment of IP addresses. Addresses are allocated to ISPs by regional registries to assign to its c

Re: Provider feedback Aleron=BAD!

2002-10-31 Thread Charles H. Gucker
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 06:56:22PM -0500, Alex Rubenstein wrote: > > If they were singly homed to Aleron, technically, they don't qualify. > Alex, Even if they weren't multihomed, they have every right to go to ARIN to request address space (provided they could justify >= a /20 allocat

RE: Provider feedback Aleron=BAD!

2002-10-31 Thread Tech Team1
We were multi-homed. Sprint was our other provider. They've been great. > > If they were singly homed to Aleron, technically, they don't qualify. >

RE: Provider feedback Aleron=BAD!

2002-10-31 Thread Alex Rubenstein
If they were singly homed to Aleron, technically, they don't qualify. On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, E.B. Dreger wrote: > > TT> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:10:01 -0600 > TT> From: Tech Team1 > > > TT> Since we had about 16 /24s (well utilized) this was going to > > And you didn't approach ARIN for PI sp

RE: Provider feedback Aleron=BAD!

2002-10-31 Thread E.B. Dreger
TT> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:10:01 -0600 TT> From: Tech Team1 TT> Since we had about 16 /24s (well utilized) this was going to And you didn't approach ARIN for PI space? Eddy -- Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network buil

RE: Provider feedback Aleron=BAD!

2002-10-31 Thread Tech Team1
David, We had a circuit through AGIS, who was bought by Telia, who was then bought by Aleron. Their billing practices were utterly terrible. Several months after Aleron aquired the network they informed us that we would now be billed an additional $250/month per /24 that we had with them! S