If not there, how about Florida?
http://www.napoftheamericas.net/
--
Neil J. McRae - Alive and Kicking
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I know that ATT and WorldCom both have pops in San
Juan. I'm not familiar with T-data.
If you're looking for robustness, go with Miami:
pretty much everyone has a pop there.
David Barak
fully RFC 1925 compliant
--- Ray Burkholder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I work for an ISP in St. Thomas, US
Hey,
Your best bet is to go with Miami, although it may be a bit
expensive to get longhaul circuits to there.. Miami is the closest major
bandwidth place from your location.. They even have internet exchange over
there on behalf of South and Central American based ISP's.
-hc
Peering Point, or existence thereof. (fwd)
Hey,
Your best bet is to go with Miami, although it may be a bit
expensive to get longhaul circuits to there.. Miami is the closest major
bandwidth place from your location.. They even have internet exchange over
there on behalf of South and Central
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Ray Burkholder wrote:
Anyway, ATT has undersea fibre to Puerto Rico. We want to get a DS3
into a Puerto Rico peering center where we can get connectivity to some
combo of ATT, Sprint, Worldcom, and T-Data. Is anyone familiar with
such a location in
Actually I know there was something of an IX starting down there
about 1999. I believe it was in the small cellular companies
facility. One of the guys from Netrail, Nathan Estes, went down to
help them out for a week. The name escapes me but perhaps he could
post it here if he recalls the
I have some history of that effort. It did not gain
traction and folded in less than a year.
Actually I know there was something of an IX starting down there
about 1999. I believe it was in the small cellular companies
facility. One of the guys from Netrail, Nathan
However, NOTA doesn't have either ATT or WorldCom...
so if you don't mind using other carriers, there were
a bunch of medium-size players, and I believe a couple
of large ones there.
David Barak
fully RFC 1925 compliant.
--- Bill Woodcock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As many people have pointed
initial communications. Now it just comes down to
logistics and negotiation.
-Original Message-
From: David Barak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: January 10, 2003 15:50
To: Bill Woodcock; Ray Burkholder
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Puerto Rico Peering Point, or existence thereof
However, NOTA doesn't have either ATT or WorldCom...
so, did any of the much-ballyhooed florida (misnomered) naps actually
manage to attract the significant (== big tier-1) isps?
randy
so, did any of the much-ballyhooed florida (misnomered) naps actually
manage to attract the significant (== big tier-1) isps?
http://www.napoftheamericas.net/membersrepresentativecustomerlist.cfm
http://www.napoftheamericas.net/memberscarriers.cfm
are they connected and peering, i.e. packets
On Fri Jan 10, 2003 at 12:08:08PM -0800, Randy Bush wrote:
so, did any of the much-ballyhooed florida (misnomered) naps actually
manage to attract the significant (== big tier-1) isps?
http://www.napoftheamericas.net/membersrepresentativecustomerlist.cfm
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:08 PM
Subject: RE: Puerto Rico Peering Point, or existence thereof.
so, did any of the much-ballyhooed florida (misnomered) naps actually
manage to attract the significant (== big tier-1) isps?
http
13 matches
Mail list logo
