Re: Rules and Regs for a LEC's and Non LEC's

2003-08-25 Thread David Diaz
Yep, if memory serves Bellsouth had 23. 1 for each one of the 22 latas and the 23rd was the dereg'ed ASN that would come after LD relief. Makes it hard to even talk about peering with other companies. Image when they ask for your ASN and you tell them u dont know offhand, u have to email the

Re: Rules and Regs for a LEC's and Non LEC's

2003-08-25 Thread Joe Provo
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 06:35:47PM -0400, McBurnett, Jim wrote: > -RBOCs (note, not ILECs) cannot move inter-lata traffic without being > -approved by PUC in each state for "interstate long distance". (I believe > -this is part of 1984 MFJ). > > -CLECs have no restrictions on that. Neither do no

RE: Rules and Regs for a LEC's and Non LEC's

2003-08-19 Thread McBurnett, Jim
-RBOCs (note, not ILECs) cannot move inter-lata traffic without being -approved by PUC in each state for "interstate long distance". (I believe -this is part of 1984 MFJ). -CLECs have no restrictions on that. Neither do non-CLEC ISPs. ---alex I thought this only applied to VOICE traffic. AS fa

Re: Rules and Regs for a LEC's and Non LEC's

2003-08-19 Thread alex
> I was told by various sources that unless the vendor of my choosing is a > LEC of some sort, they cannot back-haul production traffic as a private > network, and that this is a FCC restriction regarding LEC licensing for > traffic/long distance etc. These various sources do not have actual > da