On dinsdag, sep 2, 2003, at 23:18 Europe/Amsterdam, Nenad Pudar wrote:
Again my point is that your site (or any other that use the same dns
for ipv4 and 6) may be "blackholed" by ipv6 (it is not the question
primary about the quality ipv6 connction it is the fact that your ipv4
connection which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Jared Mauch wrote:
> (btw, for those of you who think that IPv6 isn't in use, you may now
> safely ignore this thread).
Then I will safely respond to it in that case ;)
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 04:34:18PM -0400, Nenad Pudar wrote:
> > My enviroment is far to
Nenad Pudar wrote:
Again my point is that your site (or any other that use the same dns for
ipv4 and 6) may be "blackholed" by ipv6 (it is not the question primary
about the quality ipv6 connction it is the fact that your ipv4
connection which may be excelant is blackholed with your ipv6 connec
I do not send e-maol to complain about my connection to puck.nether.net
,neither I claim I have a excelent ipv6 connection ,what triggerd
my-e-mail was the someone complining to not be able to reach your site.
I have more than few ways to making it reachable .
My e-mail was more to rise the gene
> Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 16:34:18 -0400
> From: Nenad Pudar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> My enviroment is far to be broken my friend.
> This is not question about me or my environoment this question about
> your site ,I can always mange to get such a sites if I want but I
(btw, for those of you who think that IPv6 isn't in use, you may now
safely ignore this thread).
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 04:34:18PM -0400, Nenad Pudar wrote:
> My enviroment is far to be broken my friend.
> This is not question about me or my environoment this question about
> your site ,I can a
Nenad Pudar wrote:
My enviroment is far to be broken my friend.
This is not question about me or my environoment this question about
your site ,I can always mange to get such a sites if I want but I am
not sure that some other people are even awre what the problem is.
I think that still majority
My enviroment is far to be broken my friend.
This is not question about me or my environoment this question about
your site ,I can always mange to get such a sites if I want but I am not
sure that some other people are even awre what the problem is.
I think that still majority of ipv6 connections
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Nenad Pudar wrote:
> OK
> The point is that ipv6 connection is not good enough to be used.
Wrong the v6 connection for your host isn't good enough to use. It works
fine from here...
> And for the sites that have the same dns for ipv4 and ipv6 ipv6 in a way
> "blackhole" ip
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 10:47:14PM +0300, Petri Helenius wrote:
> Nenad Pudar wrote:
>
> >OK
> >The point is that ipv6 connection is not good enough to be used.
> >And for the sites that have the same dns for ipv4 and ipv6 ipv6 in a
> >way "blackhole" ipv4 connection.
> >In this case puck.nether
Nenad Pudar wrote:
OK
The point is that ipv6 connection is not good enough to be used.
And for the sites that have the same dns for ipv4 and ipv6 ipv6 in a
way "blackhole" ipv4 connection.
In this case puck.nether.net is timinig out from time to time (going
over ipv6) instead of going over ipv4
At 11:56 -0700 9/2/03, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Nenad Pudar wrote:
Jared
Ido not understand what you consider as problem here (the problem is not
the latency which is more or less normal thing for ipv6 at this time)
"The problem" also showing on you box is that dns6 is resolved
OK
The point is that ipv6 connection is not good enough to be used.
And for the sites that have the same dns for ipv4 and ipv6 ipv6 in a way
"blackhole" ipv4 connection.
In this case puck.nether.net is timinig out from time to time (going
over ipv6) instead of going over ipv4 network.
Joel Jaegg
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Nenad Pudar wrote:
> Jared
>
> Ido not understand what you consider as problem here (the problem is not
> the latency which is more or less normal thing for ipv6 at this time)
> "The problem" also showing on you box is that dns6 is resolved first
> forcing the connection to
Nenad Pudar wrote:
Jared
Ido not understand what you consider as problem here (the problem is
not the latency which is more or less normal thing for ipv6 at this time)
"The problem" also showing on you box is that dns6 is resolved first
forcing the connection to be ipv6 which is not something th
Jared
Ido not understand what you consider as problem here (the problem is not
the latency which is more or less normal thing for ipv6 at this time)
"The problem" also showing on you box is that dns6 is resolved first
forcing the connection to be ipv6 which is not something that we really
want a
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 11:32:34AM -0400, Nenad Pudar wrote:
> Jared
>
> The "problem " with your site is that it has the same dns for ipv4 and ipv6
> In may case on dual-stack unix (sun) box dns6 is always resolved first
> (properly) and then sometimes because of the latency (ipv6) it times out
Jared
The "problem " with your site is that it has the same dns for ipv4 and ipv6
In may case on dual-stack unix (sun) box dns6 is always resolved first
(properly) and then sometimes because of the latency (ipv6) it times out.
On the other hand that prevents me from going through ipv4 connection
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 05:14:49AM -0500, neal rauhauser wrote:
> I didn't know their NOC number, puck.nether.net is down, normal phone
Uh, puck is fine.
http://puck.nether.net/netops/nocs.cgi?ispname=sprint
> channels lead to voicemail jail. Sorry to disturb your morning but its
> mu
Sprint's support contact structure is rather specialized, rather
than one-size-fits-all.
http://www.sprint.net/contacts.html
Could you kindly verify that you've tried the right place before
sending NANOG to General Quarters?
Thanx
> I didn't know their NOC number, puck.nether.net is down,
I didn't know their NOC number, puck.nether.net is down, normal phone
channels lead to voicemail jail. Sorry to disturb your morning but its
much easier to complete by 0600 than to have five counties worth of
users dialing a phone right next to where you're working.
Simon Lockhart wrote:
>
21 matches
Mail list logo
