And I wanted to download files, but certainly did not want to unwittingly
support a CDN.
Maybe everyone will simply cease using the software. It certainly
would set a nice example for other corporations implementing spyware, and
other unsavory "features".
Regards,
James
On Wed, 3 Apr 20
On Wed, 03 Apr 2002 10:55:05 EST, Anthony D Cennami said:
> The utilization of your network is something that you should address in
> your AUP. If your clients accepting the license agreement on their
> network/peer-to-peer software interferes with the operation of your
> facility or bandwidth
Anthony D Cennami wrote:
>
> You aren't maintaining anybodies distributed server farm. You're
> maintaining the infrastructure that your clients pay you to use, and
> they're allowing this application to function in the manner
> described in
> plain english within the license agreement.
T
The utilization of your network is something that you should address in
your AUP. If your clients accepting the license agreement on their
network/peer-to-peer software interferes with the operation of your
facility or bandwidth then perhaps it's time to sit down at the drawing
board again.
Maybe ISPs and carriers can file a class action suit against these guys for
something. I wanted to run a network, not manage someone else's distributed
server farm.
> -Original Message-
> From: Craig Holland [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 6:35 PM
> To: Nan
