ust my 2ยข, feel free to use your delete key."
-Original Message-
From: Matthew S. Hallacy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 1:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Stop it with putting your e-mail body in ATT attachments. Its
annoying and no one can see your
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 09:36:43PM -0700, Majdi S. Abbas wrote:
[snip]
> The breakdown:
>
> Microsoft 38.71% (not even half the way to 90%)
> Mozilla 11.41%
> Eudora 10.86%
> ELM 6.63%
> exmh
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 04:41:46PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> John Palmer wrote:
>
> > I know this is off the current subject., but some of you are sending
> > these e-mail's to the list that appear as attachments and not text.
>
> Agreed, that is annoying.
>
> It appears to be the res
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 8:56 AM
> Subject: Re: Stop it with putting your e-mail body in ATT attachments. Its
> annoying and no one can see your message
>
> >
> > On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Majdi S. Abbas wrote:
> >
> > > Of the remain
esday, July 10, 2002 8:56 AM
Subject: Re: Stop it with putting your e-mail body in ATT attachments. Its
annoying and no one can see your message
>
> On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Majdi S. Abbas wrote:
>
> > Of the remaining 9638, there are 523 unique X-Mailer
> > references. I disqual
On 07/09/02, "Majdi S. Abbas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > your hostility towards Microsoft and recognize that they are the dominant
> > desktop (something like 90%) and you need to get used to it and stop
> > fighting.
>
> On NANOG? Are you sure?
Even in its heyday, the NANO
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 05:50:52PM -0500, John Palmer wrote:
> There is nothing wrong with MS Outlook express. You need to stem
Surely you must be joking.
> your hostility towards Microsoft and recognize that they are the dominant
> desktop (something like 90%) and you need to get used
Thus spake "Bill Woodcock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > There is nothing wrong with MS Outlook express.
>
> Uh, you _are_ joking, right?
Outlook and Outlook Express have very similar GUI's, but are very different
under the hood. OE has a lot more in common with Eudora than it does with
"real"
"Adam McKenna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just because it is the dominant MUA does not make it correct. There are
> plenty of MUA's out there that have no problem displaying those messages.
Apologies in advance for perpetuating this OT flame war Anyone with MUA
replacement suggestions n
uesday, July 09, 2002 5:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Stop it with putting your e-mail body in ATT attachments.
Its annoying and no one can see your message
There is nothing wrong with MS Outlook express. You need to stem
your hostility towards Microsoft and recognize that they are the d
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 05:50:52PM -0500, John Palmer wrote:
>
> There is nothing wrong with MS Outlook express. You need to stem
> your hostility towards Microsoft and recognize that they are the dominant
> desktop (something like 90%) and you need to get used to it and stop
> fighting.
Just b
ROTECTED]>
To: "John Palmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 5:36 PM
Subject: Re: Stop it with putting your e-mail body in ATT attachments. Its annoying
and no one can see your message
> John,
>
> use a real MUA and you will have no problem. Someth
John Palmer wrote:
> I know this is off the current subject., but some of you are sending
> these e-mail's to the list that appear as attachments and not text.
Agreed, that is annoying.
It appears to be the result of PGP signed messages, from every instance I
can see:
X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.2.
13 matches
Mail list logo
