> And once word got out that UU would take calls from anyone, every
> schmuck, crackpot, and prank call would be reporting something
> somewhere.
Paging Jim Fleming. Jim Fleming please pick up the white courtesy phone.
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 10:17:49AM -0400, Bradley Corner wrote:
> Thanks for all the 'wonderful' input. I guess most of you feel that the
> attitude of UUNET is appropriate. When I read responses on NANOG I am
> utterly surprised by the total lack of professionalism. I have always
> prided myself
Title: RE: UUNET service
Bradley,
I believe you received the appropriate reaction. What I don't agree with is your reaction to the feedback. Every person response addressed the issue, not you as an individual. You however post this, and attack others' professionalism? tsk tsk
Thanks for all the 'wonderful' input. I guess most of you feel that the
attitude of UUNET is appropriate. When I read responses on NANOG I am
utterly surprised by the total lack of professionalism. I have always
prided myself on my education and experience and my Professional
attitude towards my p
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: 12 April 2002 4:21 PM
>To: Bradley Corner
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: UUNET service
>
>
>
>To me, that looks more like an outage (now fixed) on a
>customer network. The 'loop' between
>500.Serial2-11.GW4.BWI1.ALTER.
]]
Sent: 12 April 2002 4:21 PM
To: Bradley Corner
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: UUNET service
To me, that looks more like an outage (now fixed) on a customer network.
The 'loop' between 500.Serial2-11.GW4.BWI1.ALTER.NET and
core62007-gw.customer.alter.net, could likely be caus
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 04:04:42PM -0400, Bradley Corner wrote:
> I tried to notify UUNET at their 800-900-0241 number that there was a
> loop in their network. They told me that if I didnt have an account
> with them they were not interested in any information that I may have
> had for them. I
A thought-provoking issue to be sure, but it is already chronicled
in the Archives of NANOG.
> Also sprach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >To me, that looks more like an outage (now fixed) on a customer
> >network. The 'loop' between 500.Serial2-11.GW4.BWI1.ALTER.NET and
> >core62007-gw.customer.alter.ne
Also sprach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To me, that looks more like an outage (now fixed) on a customer
>network. The 'loop' between 500.Serial2-11.GW4.BWI1.ALTER.NET and
>core62007-gw.customer.alter.net, could likely be caused by UU's
>customer advertising an aggregate route to UU, but not actually havi
To me, that looks more like an outage (now fixed) on a customer network.
The 'loop' between 500.Serial2-11.GW4.BWI1.ALTER.NET and
core62007-gw.customer.alter.net, could likely be caused by UU's customer
advertising an aggregate route to UU, but not actually having a route to
the IP...so they defa
10 matches
Mail list logo
