On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Curtis Maurand wrote:
>
> Can someone from verizon.net contact me re: mail delivery troubles off
> list please? I'm relaying mail for a particular person in one of my
> hosted domains who is a verizon.net customer and all I'm getting is
> errors. I accept mail, process it fo
Curtis Maurand [1/29/2004 4:21 AM] :
Can someone from verizon.net contact me re: mail delivery troubles off
list please? I'm relaying mail for a particular person in one of my
hosted domains who is a verizon.net customer and all I'm getting is
errors. I accept mail, process it for spam and vi
Andy Dills wrote:
Getting Verizon to do anything involving the internet, even if you possess
the phone number of the department to call, is impossible. They do a good
job with circuits. They do an abysmal job with IP and related issues.
This must be a different Verizon than I dealt with at a co
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Bob Snyder wrote:
>
> Andy Dills wrote:
>
> >Getting Verizon to do anything involving the internet, even if you possess
> >the phone number of the department to call, is impossible. They do a good
> >job with circuits. They do an abysmal job with IP and related issues.
> >
>
Andy Dills wrote:
Verizon? Colo? ISP?
Probably should have expressed that more clearly. Not colo'ing at
Verizon, but an Internet colocation facility that also provides it's
customers with T1 and Frame Relay connectivity to the Internet.
But they've never had a sonet outage once in our entir
:But they've never had a sonet outage once in our entire time of doing
:business with them. So they do employ competent people. Plenty of them.
:But they aren't concerned with IP or SMTP.
Absolutely. Without delving into regulatory details, prior to the
initiation of VADI (possibly the most egre
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Brian Wallingford wrote:
> There's no question that there's a certain amount of social engineering
> involved in contacting (or being allowed to contact) competent folk. It's
> advisable to be sure that any staff who will be contacting them are fully versed in
> any services
Brian Wallingford
Cc: Andy Dills; Bob Snyder; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Verizon mail troubles
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Brian Wallingford wrote:
> There's no question that there's a certain amount of social
> engineering involved in contacting (or being allowed to contact)
&g
I can only deduce, from watching this thread, that Verizon and SBC must
share technicians and telephone support personnel.
Dave Hilton
Staff System Administrator
entelos(r)
Foster City, CA
Asset (n.): Diminutive posterior. See BACKUP.
Backup (n. or v.): Method of protecting Asset.
Once upon a time, Alon Tirosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> We put a move order in with VZ for June 12, then rescheduled to July 12
> (we were moving across the st.) of this year.
On the subject of moves, I will have to offer some praise for BellSouth.
When we moved our NOC about half a mile down t
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Andy Dills
> Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 10:47 PM
> To: Bob Snyder
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Verizon mail troubles
>
>
>
> Now, they do have
Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered:
>
>
> Personal Favorite:
>
> We put a move order in with VZ for June 12, then rescheduled to July 12
> (we were moving across the st.) of this year. On May 12 we come in and
> discover that half our lines don't work. After 4 hours on t
Hello all,
Thanks to all who responded to my request for help with verizon email
issues. Someone from Verizon did contact me and clued me in as to
what was happening.
It turns out procmail is rewriting a header with a fqdn for the mail
server which doesn't have a specific mx record set for i
Hello all,
Thanks to all who responded to my request for help with verizon email
issues. Someone from Verizon did contact me and clued me in as to
what was happening.
It turns out procmail is rewriting a header with a fqdn for the mail
server which doesn't have a specific mx record set for i
14 matches
Mail list logo
