Hi Folks,
Sorry about that, something seems to have broken when the script was run
earlier on today. The table in the view I use was 140k prefixes then,
and is now back up to the normal 159k again.
philip
--
Joe Loiacono said the following on 09/04/2005 06:48:
Wha happen?
Routing Table Report
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 2:00 PM
>To: Joe Loiacono
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Weekly Routing Table Report
>
>On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 16:48:53 EDT, J
On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 16:48:53 EDT, Joe Loiacono said:
> Wha happen?
>
> Routing Table Report 04:00 +10GMT Sat 09 Apr, 2005
> Total ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 17729
> Routing Table Report 04:00 +10GMT Sat 02 Apr, 2005
> Total ASes present in the Internet Routin
Wha happen?
Routing Table Report 04:00 +10GMT Sat 09 Apr, 2005
Analysis Summary
BGP routing table entries examined: 139674
Prefixes after maximum aggregation: 83474
Unique aggregates announced to Internet:
> The largest growth element I see is deaggregation of 'classical'
> space which may have perfectly valid purpose within an AS, or in
> a provider-customer relationship, but not N hops away in the DFZ.
> The reasons vary from putting the burden of traffic engineering
> on the rest of the world t
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 03:47:08PM -0500, Jared Mauch wrote:
[snip]
> I think that's a matter that seems to be already decided.
> People want multihoming, redudnancy and such and are willing
> to put the burden on the global routing table as a result.
The matter was not strictly (not eve
How much has the second number changed? Is this the result of worsening
aggregation or simply more address space being advertised?
Core routers won't even blink at 200k routes. I wonder how many enterprise
3x00/7x00 routers will fall over due to memory issues.
Also, as we have learned previous
--On Friday, January 07, 2005 18:15 -0600 Jerry Pasker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
This was about the weekly routing table report, but I'm going to bring in
some numbers from the CIDR report.
It would be back down to 140k if the "dirty 30" top offenders in the
CIDR Report would aggregate their r
Analysis Summary
BGP routing table entries examined: 153319
Prefixes after maximum aggregation: 89967
Should it matter that in six months its gone from 140k to 153k?
At this rate it might crack 200k in less than two years
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 03:02:40PM -0500, Joe Maimon wrote:
> >This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
> >Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
> >Daily listings are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith
Routing Table Analysis wrote:
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
Daily listings are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Routing Table Report 0
Routing Table Report 04:00 +10GMT Sat 13 Dec, 2003
...
ARIN Region per AS prefix count summary
---
ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description
7018 1420 7058 988 AT&T
701 1417 8664 973 UUNET Technologies, Inc.
12 matches
Mail list logo
