On 13 Aug 2006, Paul Vixie wrote:
which is, please move these threads to a non-SP mailing list.
R [ 41: Danny McPherson ] Re: mitigating botnet CCs has become useless
R [ 22: Laurence F. Sheldon]
R45: Danny McPherson
R [ 62: Laurence F. Sheldon]
R
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 02:48:01PM -0500, Gadi Evron wrote:
Paul, apparently, we are in disagreement! :)
Botnets are an operational issue affecting most of every large carrier to
momspops service provider here.
I believe a lot of the information about botnets, which is not that
I have to agree... I joined this list a few weeks ago, and am pretty
sad at the garbage I have to sift through. It's more of a FLAME Thrower
if you ask me.
I'm giving it another few days, and I'm off to looking for other lists
that are much more useful than this deal here.
Robert Hantson
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 02:48:01PM -0500, Gadi Evron wrote:
Paul, apparently, we are in disagreement! :)
Botnets are an operational issue affecting most of every large carrier to
momspops service provider here.
I believe a lot of
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:15:25 EDT, Richard A Steenbergen said:
If this is all we have to talk about and it is on-topic, then NANOG has
failed, and we need a new list where people can actually discuss network
operations.
Admittedly, discussions about how to mitigate a botnet are less on topic
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, Gadi Evron wrote:
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
If this is all we have to talk about and it is on-topic, then NANOG has
failed, and we need a new list where people can actually discuss network
operations.
Who is stopping you? Either to raise
http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/botnets
thanks, didn't know about it. But isn't it still usefull, when urgent
matters concerning botnets will still discussed on the nanog-list?
Please let me disabussed to it, but it's just my opinion.
almost everything that happens in
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 04:42:31PM +, Paul Vixie wrote:
http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/botnets
thanks, didn't know about it. But isn't it still usefull, when urgent
matters concerning botnets will still discussed on the nanog-list?
Please let me disabussed
Thomas Kuehling wrote:
Dear Fergie,
On So, 2006-08-13 at 21:49 +, Fergie wrote:
For what it's worth, there _is_ a botnet discussison list:
General information about the mailing list is at:
http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/botnets
thanks, didn't know about it. But
I'm not a list moderator either, anymore. I spent enough time moderating
the NANOG list to get thoroughly disgusted with those who need babysitters
to supervise them in a professional forum. I'm sure the current group of
volunteer moderators would appreciate some common sense and common
Paul Vixie wrote:
which is, please move these threads to a non-SP mailing list.
R [ 41: Danny McPherson ] Re: mitigating botnet CCs has become useless
R [ 22: Laurence F. Sheldon]
R45: Danny McPherson
R [ 62: Laurence F. Sheldon]
R [ 162: J. Oquendo
On Aug 13, 2006, at 1:02 PM, Paul Vixie wrote:
which is, please move these threads to a non-SP mailing list.
R [ 41: Danny McPherson ] Re: mitigating botnet CCs has
become useless
R [ 22: Laurence F. Sheldon]
R45: Danny McPherson
R [ 62: Laurence F.
Dear all,
On So, 2006-08-13 at 15:17 -0600, Danny McPherson wrote:
Interestingly enough, I lurk here 99.999% of the time. I comment
on this thread and folks ask to move it to a non-SP mailing list?
Perhaps
non-operational, but this certainly has direct implications on SPs and
I'm of the
For what it's worth, there _is_ a botnet discussison list:
General information about the mailing list is at:
http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/botnets
- ferg
-- Thomas Kuehling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear all,
On So, 2006-08-13 at 15:17 -0600, Danny McPherson wrote:
Dear Fergie,
On So, 2006-08-13 at 21:49 +, Fergie wrote:
For what it's worth, there _is_ a botnet discussison list:
General information about the mailing list is at:
http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/botnets
thanks, didn't know about it. But isn't it still usefull,
My personal opinion is that _some_ bitnet issues are indeed
relevant to the NANOG list, but that's just me. :-)
I mean, it _does_ affect network ops at times...
- ferg
-- Thomas Kuehling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Fergie,
On So, 2006-08-13 at 21:49 +, Fergie wrote:
For what it's
16 matches
Mail list logo
