Re: redistribute bgp considered harmful

2002-10-07 Thread Iljitsch van Beijnum
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, David Luyer wrote: > > But not allowing BGP -> IGP -> BGP might be a good one. On the other hand, > > someone who is determined to screw up could do BGP -> IGP on one router > > and IGP -> BGP on another. > I've seen that done. And usefully. But it's just too dangerous. >

Re: redistribute bgp considered harmful

2002-10-07 Thread Stephen J. Wilcox
I tend to favour allowing features rather than restricting them, if paranoia is needed then perhaps a confirm prompt? Dont forget tho BGP is used for things other than Internet routing eg VPN, VRF and in those cases I can imagine such redistributions being beneficial. Steve On Mon, 7 Oct 200

Re: redistribute bgp considered harmful

2002-10-07 Thread David Luyer
Iljitsch van Beijnum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But not allowing BGP -> IGP -> BGP might be a good one. On the other hand, > someone who is determined to screw up could do BGP -> IGP on one router > and IGP -> BGP on another. I've seen that done. And usefully. The case involved an AGS+ (BGP

Re: redistribute bgp considered harmful

2002-10-04 Thread Joe Abley
On Friday, Oct 4, 2002, at 18:01 Canada/Eastern, Sean Donelan wrote: > Should the Service Provider version of routing software include the > redistribute bgp command? Other than CCIE labs, I haven't seen a > real-world use for redistributing the BGP route table into any IGP. > > If the command

Re: redistribute bgp considered harmful

2002-10-04 Thread Nigel Taylor
Sean, See Inline... - Original Message - From: "Sean Donelan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 6:01 PM Subject: redistribute bgp considered harmful > > > Should the Service Provider version of routing software include the > redistribute

Re: redistribute bgp considered harmful

2002-10-04 Thread E.B. Dreger
SD> Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 18:01:15 -0400 (EDT) SD> From: Sean Donelan SD> Should the Service Provider version of routing software SD> include the redistribute bgp command? Other than CCIE labs, SD> I haven't seen a real-world use for redistributing the BGP SD> route table into any IGP.

Re: redistribute bgp considered harmful

2002-10-04 Thread Iljitsch van Beijnum
On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Sean Donelan wrote: > Should the Service Provider version of routing software include the > redistribute bgp command? Other than CCIE labs, I haven't seen a > real-world use for redistributing the BGP route table into any IGP. I don't think it's the business of anyone outsi

Re: redistribute bgp considered harmful

2002-10-04 Thread Kevin Oberman
> Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 18:01:15 -0400 (EDT) > From: Sean Donelan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Should the Service Provider version of routing software include the > redistribute bgp command? Other than CCIE labs, I haven't seen a > real-world use for redistributing

RE: redistribute bgp considered harmful

2002-10-04 Thread Andrew . McConnell
PROTECTED] com> cc: Sent by: Subject: RE: redistribute bgp consi

RE: redistribute bgp considered harmful

2002-10-04 Thread Charles Youse
I've never subscribed to the "Are you sure?" concept, or preventing problems by removing functionality, effectively tying an operator's hands behind his/her back. The fact is that redistributing BGP into an IGP can have its uses (though not usually, okay, never, when carrying a full table on the