t this time.
--D
--
-- Darren Bolding
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Haesu
> Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 5:10 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: rfc1918 ignorant (fwd)
>
>
>
> Well, if uBR
>
> Hmm this could affect routing protocols which use the primary address..
>
I haven't tried doing that with igp protocols.. But with BGP, it works does
manage to bind itself to the working address. (Or if you are sourcing update
to loopback, that would be fine too)
>
> Right but this one b
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Haesu wrote:
> Well, if uBR showing RFC1918 address out on the traceroute is an issue, why not
> just reverse the way its configured?
>
> Put RFC1918 as secondary, and put the routable addr as primary. Either way, it
> should work w/o issues, right?
Hmm this could affect r
Well, if uBR showing RFC1918 address out on the traceroute is an issue, why not
just reverse the way its configured?
Put RFC1918 as secondary, and put the routable addr as primary. Either way, it
should work w/o issues, right?
I know quite a few people who purposely put a non-routable IP (whethe
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 06:03:13PM -0400, Daniel Senie wrote:
> At 02:11 PM 7/23/2003, Dave Temkin wrote:
>
> >2003 7:07 AM:]
> >> Comcast and many others seem to
> >> blithely ignore this for convenience sake. (It's not like they need a
> >> huge amount of space to give private addresses to thes
At 02:11 PM 7/23/2003, Dave Temkin wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 07:53:26 -1000
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: rfc1918 ignorant
There's a common misconception reflected here that I wanted to correct. I
don't
> ARIN required cable operators to use RFC 1918 space for the management
> agents of the bridge cable modems that have been rolled out to the
> millions of residential cable modem customers.
this would be really amazing, as it would have required a time machine.
the cable build was before arin ex
So this, as many other discussions in the past, ends with the conclusion
that ARIN did their share of breaking RFC´s and the Internet ?
Pete
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Temkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 9:11 P
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 07:53:26 -1000
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: rfc1918 ignorant
There's a common misconception reflected here that I wanted to correct. I
don't have nanog-post, so I apologize if its n
