Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes)

2002-08-09 Thread Stephen Sprunk
Thus spake "Brad Knowles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > At 1:23 AM + 2002/08/08, Paul Vixie wrote: > > > When I tell USG how I feel, they seem to ignore me. Your mileage may vary. > > True enough. But their machines could always be removed from the > list of known root servers, and I don't think t

Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes)

2002-08-09 Thread Randy Bush
> The USG runs, directly or indirectly, 6 of the 13 root servers, imiho, it is more important, and undesirable, that the usg controls the *content* of the root zone. randy

Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes)

2002-08-09 Thread Paul Vixie
> > When I tell USG how I feel, they seem to ignore me. Your mileage may vary. > > True enough. But their machines could always be removed from the > list of known root servers, and I don't think that there's much they > could do about it. that is absolutely false, in several different